2019
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2019.00295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Resolution Attenuation Images From Active Seismic Data: The Case Study of Solfatara Volcano (Southern Italy)

Abstract: The quality factor Q is highly sensitive to the medium properties related to the fluid presence, like porosity, permeability, and level of rock saturation. Therefore, it is very useful to image the subsoil of volcanoes in terms of anelastic images, in addition to more common elastic tomographic models. In this setting, indeed, fluids play a key role in controlling and governing the evolution of magmatic processes, so their accurate identification and tracking is crucial. Here, we describe a methodology that al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is extensive evidence of the dependence of seismic attenuation and absorption on thermal variations at the mantle, crustal, and volcano scales (Abers et al., 2006; Cammarano & Romanowicz, 2008; De Lorenzo et al., 2001), with high thermal potential the most likely explanation for absorption increases at locations Aa1‐Aa3. On the other hand, geochemical variations caused by different fluid compositions and saturation levels can equally change attenuation in space (Amoroso et al., 2017; De Landro et al., 2019), especially within an active hydrothermal system (Di Martino et al., 2021). The NE‐SW and NNE‐SSW high‐absorption trends correspond to the measured variations in Mn and As, respectively (Rey et al., 2002; Somoza et al., 2004) (Figure 3d).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is extensive evidence of the dependence of seismic attenuation and absorption on thermal variations at the mantle, crustal, and volcano scales (Abers et al., 2006; Cammarano & Romanowicz, 2008; De Lorenzo et al., 2001), with high thermal potential the most likely explanation for absorption increases at locations Aa1‐Aa3. On the other hand, geochemical variations caused by different fluid compositions and saturation levels can equally change attenuation in space (Amoroso et al., 2017; De Landro et al., 2019), especially within an active hydrothermal system (Di Martino et al., 2021). The NE‐SW and NNE‐SSW high‐absorption trends correspond to the measured variations in Mn and As, respectively (Rey et al., 2002; Somoza et al., 2004) (Figure 3d).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature, geochemistry, pore‐pressure, and fluid content within fractures affect seismic absorption (Amoroso et al., 2017; De Landro et al., 2019; Di Martino et al., 2021; Tisato et al., 2015). This parameter is thus the ideal candidate to detect eruptive pathways for fluids and magma at volcanoes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%