1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High rate of chromosome abnormalities detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization using BCR and ABL probes in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Abstract: 8 GMALL study groupThe value of dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with BCR and ABL probes for the detection of the Philadelphia (Ph) translocation and of other alterations involving ABL and/or BCR was evaluated in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). One hundred and four patients were studied prospectively using interphase nuclei FISH, chromosome analysis (CA), and PCR assays for the chimeric BRC/ABL transcript.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since additional karyotypic changes (eg supernumerary Ph, gain or loss of chromosomes 9 and 22, as well as deletions of 9q and 22q) can occur in BCR/ABL + CML, ALL and AML cases, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] other atypical iFISH patterns could be expected as observed in around one-sixth of all cases studied; conversely, cases with additional cytogenetic changes could present as a typical pattern and potentially be misdiagnosed with iFISH. Exact interpretation of the atypical iFISH patterns obtained in individual cases was dependent on the analysis of metaphases complemented with molecular definition of the breakpoint.…”
Section: Patterns Of Bcr/ablmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since additional karyotypic changes (eg supernumerary Ph, gain or loss of chromosomes 9 and 22, as well as deletions of 9q and 22q) can occur in BCR/ABL + CML, ALL and AML cases, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] other atypical iFISH patterns could be expected as observed in around one-sixth of all cases studied; conversely, cases with additional cytogenetic changes could present as a typical pattern and potentially be misdiagnosed with iFISH. Exact interpretation of the atypical iFISH patterns obtained in individual cases was dependent on the analysis of metaphases complemented with molecular definition of the breakpoint.…”
Section: Patterns Of Bcr/ablmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional variations to the typical iFISH patterns can be caused by numerical changes such as gain of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome, and to deletions of sequences proximal to the breakpoint on chromosome 9 or distal to the breakpoint on chromosome 22. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of atypical iFISH patterns of BCR/ABL gene rearrangements and to establish the specific underlying molecular abnormalities carried by the neoplastic cells, in a large series of 168 consecutive BCR/ABL + leukemias, which included CML, precursor B-ALL and AML cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 FISH was carried out on 55 samples prospectively and on 19 samples rectrospectively by commercially available directly labeled probes for BCR and ABL (VYSIS, Downer's Grove, IL, USA) as described. 14 The cut-off value for false positive nuclei was set at 6% (mean, plus 3 × standard deviation). 14 …”
Section: Cytogenetic Analysis and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The cut-off value for false positive nuclei was set at 6% (mean, plus 3 × standard deviation). 14 …”
Section: Cytogenetic Analysis and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation