2004
DOI: 10.1128/aac.48.8.3193-3195.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Prevalence of the ermB Gene among Erythromycin-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates in Germany during the Winter of 2000-2001 and In Vitro Activity of Telithromycin

Abstract: Of 595 isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from outpatients with respiratory tract infections, collected from 17 microbiology laboratories, 14.1% were resistant to erythromycin. Eighty-three erythromycin-resistant isolates were genetically analyzed, 83.1% of which harbored the ermB gene. Only four isolates (4.8%) harbored the mefA gene. Telithromycin exhibited potent activity against all isolates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(20 reference statements)
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important observation of the present study was the predominance of isolates displaying the M phenotype and harbouring the mef(A) ⁄ (E) gene. This is in contrast with the data from most other European countries, where the spread of macrolide resistance is associated mainly with erm-positive strains [28][29][30][31][32][33]. However, the M resistance phenotype, mediated by the mef(A) ⁄ (E) gene, is predominant among macrolide-resistant pneumococci in Canada [34] and the USA [27].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Another important observation of the present study was the predominance of isolates displaying the M phenotype and harbouring the mef(A) ⁄ (E) gene. This is in contrast with the data from most other European countries, where the spread of macrolide resistance is associated mainly with erm-positive strains [28][29][30][31][32][33]. However, the M resistance phenotype, mediated by the mef(A) ⁄ (E) gene, is predominant among macrolide-resistant pneumococci in Canada [34] and the USA [27].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Although telithromycin showed excellent activity against all pneumococcal isolates, the MICs for macrolide‐resistant isolates were increased in comparison to macrolide‐susceptible isolates, indicating that resistance to erythromycin influences the potency of telithromycin. An increased telithromycin MIC has not been shown to be clinically relevant [31–33]; in the current study, all erythromycin‐resistant isolates were highly susceptible to telithromycin, irrespective of the mechanism of resistance. Although telithromycin is considered to be a poor substrate for the efflux pump [34], mef‐ positive isolates had higher telithromycin MICs than erm (B)‐positive isolates, which is in agreement with other published data [35,36], but the mechanism involved is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Methylation of the ribosomal drug binding site, which confers resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin group B (MLSB) may be inducibly or constitutively expressed (Leclercq, 2002). Previously, the most prevalent mechanism of macrolide resistance was also associated with ermB gene in Streptococcus pneumoniae (Kresken et al, 2004;Reinert et al, 2008). Drug efflux conferring low-level resistance to erythromycin but not clindamycin, encoded by the mefA gene, was not detected in this study.…”
Section: Arg Screeningmentioning
confidence: 60%