2016
DOI: 10.1007/jhep05(2016)058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High precision determination of the gluon fusion Higgs boson cross-section at the LHC

Abstract: We present the most precise value for the Higgs boson cross-section in the gluon-fusion production mode at the LHC. Our result is based on a perturbative expansion through N 3 LO in QCD, in an effective theory where the top-quark is assumed to be infinitely heavy, while all other Standard Model quarks are massless. We combine this result with QCD corrections to the cross-section where all finite quark-mass effects are included exactly through NLO. In addition, electroweak corrections and the first corrections … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
449
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 370 publications
(470 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
14
449
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work we update the results of refs. [13], in view of the recently computed N 3 LO result [9][10][11][12]. We discuss the impact of the resummation on the central value and we suggest a robust way of estimating the theoretical uncertainty due to missing higher orders, which goes beyond traditional scale variation.…”
Section: Jhep08(2016)105mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work we update the results of refs. [13], in view of the recently computed N 3 LO result [9][10][11][12]. We discuss the impact of the resummation on the central value and we suggest a robust way of estimating the theoretical uncertainty due to missing higher orders, which goes beyond traditional scale variation.…”
Section: Jhep08(2016)105mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, NNLO corrections are also significant. Recently, a milestone calculation of third-order perturbative coefficient was performed [9][10][11][12]. N 3 LO corrections appear to be small, indicating that the perturbative series is finally manifesting convergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the recent work [77] on inclusive Higgs production in NNNLO QCD we observe the almost one-to-one behaviour between the top inclusive cross-section at order N n LO and the total Higgs cross-section 4 at order N n+1 LO for n = 0, 1, 2 as a function of the scale µ. Importantly, the analogy extends also to the resummed NNLO cross-section, especially the rise of the NNLL resummed cross-section for larger values of µ.…”
Section: Jhep04(2017)071mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Very recently, NNNLO QCD corrections were calculated for the Higgs total production cross section in gluon-gluon fusion [3,4]. The residual factorization/renormalization scales variation moved from about 10-15% of the NNLO calculation (supplemented by NNLL resummation) to about 5% of the current result.…”
Section: Jhep09(2016)091mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the MIs I 1,...,31 admit a representation in terms of GPLs which is convenient for their numerical evaluation. As for the remaining MIs, we followed the procedure outlined in section 3.3: we express the solution up to weight 2 for I 32 and up to weight 3 for I 33,...,36 in terms of GPLs and then obtain an 1-fold integral representation for the higher weights (for I (4) 32,..., 36 we use eq. (3.29)).…”
Section: Jhep09(2016)091mentioning
confidence: 99%