2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablations using contact force sensing catheters: Outcomes and predictors of success including posterior wall isolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Calzolari et al 15 When ablating near the esophagus, the RF times were shortened by a few seconds. 18 In their study, no esophagus-related complications were reported. Although the lesion durability was unclear, an HPSD on the posterior wall near the esophagus might be acceptable for assuring the safety.…”
Section: Ablation Lesion Width Assessed By Lge-mrimentioning
confidence: 88%
“…6 Calzolari et al 15 When ablating near the esophagus, the RF times were shortened by a few seconds. 18 In their study, no esophagus-related complications were reported. Although the lesion durability was unclear, an HPSD on the posterior wall near the esophagus might be acceptable for assuring the safety.…”
Section: Ablation Lesion Width Assessed By Lge-mrimentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In our opinion, the lack of an effective indicator of transmural lesion formation may be another reason: in the HPSD approach, catheter movement on the posterior wall was guided by dwell time, while it was based upon meeting a local attenuation of electrograms in low power group. A recently published study examined 4‐year outcomes after HPSD ablations with a target CF of 10–40 g (conducted using Biosense Webster or St. Jude CF‐sensing catheters), and the RF times were shortened by a few seconds when ablating the posterior wall 23 . The 4‐year freedom from AF after HPSD ablations were paroxysmal AF: 87.0%, persistent AF: 71.9%, and longstanding AF: 64.9%.…”
Section: Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies 21,26,27,30 tended to lower the RF power on the posterior wall by 5–10 W than that of the anterior wall, while other studies 22,32 reported reduced ablation duration times. Some studies 23,25,28 suggested using a fixed power setting with the guidance of LSI or AI. Thus, managing HPSD ablation on the posterior wall is worthy of further research.…”
Section: Current Existing Problems and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wesentlicher Vorteil dieser sog. HPSD-Protokolle sind die kürzere Eingriffsdauer sowie eine mutmaßlich dauerhaftere Ablationsläsion [12,24,25]. Anders als bei Standard-Radiofrequenz(RF)-Protokollen führte im vorliegenden Fall die gesteigerte Energieabgabe zu einer sehr schnellen Läsionsbildung, sodass auf den schlagartigen Impedanzanstieg und der damit drohenden Gewebeexplosion nicht mehr präventiv reagiert werden konnte.…”
Section: Komplikationsmanagement Bei Vorhofperforation -Ist Der Weg Zunclassified