2006
DOI: 10.1021/nl062213d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Performance Transparent Conducting Oxide Nanowires

Abstract: We report the growth and characterization of single-crystalline Sn-doped In 2 O 3 (ITO) and Mo-doped In 2 O 3 (IMO) nanowires. Epitaxial growth of vertically aligned ITO nanowire arrays was achieved on ITO/yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) substrates. Optical transmittance and electrical transport measurements show that these nanowires are high-performance transparent metallic conductors with transmittance of ∼85% in the visible range, resistivities as low as 6.29 × 10 -5 Ω·cm and failure-current densities as h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

14
152
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
14
152
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted electrical measurements on a series of nanowire-containing segments using corner contacts to areas of the nanowire layer in the van der Pauw geometry [18]. The conductivity of the pure (In 1.875 Sn 0.125 )O 3 branched nanowires is typically measured to be 1053.5 ± 42.3 S cm -1 at room temperature, which is similar to the values previously reported for other individual nanowires and two orders of magnitude greater than individual In 2 O 3 or SnO 2 nanowires [2]. We note that our conductivity values are similar to those reported previously [16] for Sn-doped (5-8 atom%) In 2 O 3 nanowires, whereas that of In 2 O 3 nanowires without intentional doping is of the order of 1 S cm -1 .…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…We conducted electrical measurements on a series of nanowire-containing segments using corner contacts to areas of the nanowire layer in the van der Pauw geometry [18]. The conductivity of the pure (In 1.875 Sn 0.125 )O 3 branched nanowires is typically measured to be 1053.5 ± 42.3 S cm -1 at room temperature, which is similar to the values previously reported for other individual nanowires and two orders of magnitude greater than individual In 2 O 3 or SnO 2 nanowires [2]. We note that our conductivity values are similar to those reported previously [16] for Sn-doped (5-8 atom%) In 2 O 3 nanowires, whereas that of In 2 O 3 nanowires without intentional doping is of the order of 1 S cm -1 .…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…Although ITO used in practical applications is mainly in the thin film form, there is considerable interest in ITO nanostructures [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], since they can result in very low resistivity [4], as well as enable improved performance of solar cells due to improved charge collection [6]. Growth of ITO nanostructures using different methods has been reported [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], such as chemical vapor deposition [4,8,10,14,15], chemical synthesis [5], oblique-incidence electron-beam (ebeam) deposition [6,13], sol electrophoresis [7], sputtering [9,11], and thermal treatment [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a slight variation, this strategy has also been applied to solution phase synthesis such as the solution-liquid-solid (SLS) growth [32]. Importantly, the branches of complex nanostructures created by this approach can be of different composition from that of the trunk, as has been demonstrated in examples of ZnO/In 2 O 3 [33], ZnO/SnO 2 [32], CdS/ZnS [34], In 2 O 3 /ITO [35] and carbon nanotube/SiC [36]. …”
Section: Controlled Branching Through Sequential Seedingmentioning
confidence: 99%