2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High performance graphene oxide nanofiltration membrane prepared by electrospraying for wastewater purification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More importantly, large‐area lamellar membrane (≈720 cm 2 , 22 cm × 33 cm) is readily obtained with no cracks (Figure S11, Supporting Information). This should be the largest GO‐based membrane reported in literatures to date . However, membrane size and fabrication efficiency are governed by the receiver size and amount of nozzle, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…More importantly, large‐area lamellar membrane (≈720 cm 2 , 22 cm × 33 cm) is readily obtained with no cracks (Figure S11, Supporting Information). This should be the largest GO‐based membrane reported in literatures to date . However, membrane size and fabrication efficiency are governed by the receiver size and amount of nozzle, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Only the coeffi cient of determination is not enough to correctly assess the suitability of the mathematical model to describe the experimental data, so another better criterion for the assessment of experimental isotherm data, a parameter known as average relative error, was used to evaluate the goodness-of-fi t of a model to data. The average relative error P is given by the following equation: (6) where q e,exp (mg/g) is the experimental q e at various C e , q e,cal (mg/g) is the corresponding calculated q e according to the equation under study with the best fi tted parameters, and N is the number of observations. It is generally accepted that when the P value is less than 5, the fi tting is considered to be excellent 48 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When conducting research on composite membranes, it was observed that the anionic surfactants were well separated, at the same time influencing the improvement of flux parameters on GO/PAN membranes. The observed phenomenon may result from the negative charge of composite membranes, which was described in our previous paper [20] and in the work of Chen et al [25]. However, in the case of nonionic surfactant studies, it was observed that on the GO/PAN membranes the permeate flux decreased and the separation properties deteriorated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%