2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3038496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Performance Digital Filtering on Truncated Multiply-Accumulate Units in the Residue Number System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
7

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum clock frequency of the proposed device is 31.03% -38.46% higher compared with device based on Winograd method [9] and 1.89% -2.94% higher compared to the filter based on MAC [23] units for the case of 8-and 16-bit devices, but 26.21% less for the case of 8-bit devices. Nevertheless, in comparison with the TMAC-based filter architecture in PNS [13] and in RNS [14] the performance of the proposed device is 7.89% -35.59% lower. The number of LUTs occupied by the proposed device is 18.08% -37.27% less compared with the filter based on Winograd method [9], but 3.83 -7.74 times more compared to other reviewed known architectures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The maximum clock frequency of the proposed device is 31.03% -38.46% higher compared with device based on Winograd method [9] and 1.89% -2.94% higher compared to the filter based on MAC [23] units for the case of 8-and 16-bit devices, but 26.21% less for the case of 8-bit devices. Nevertheless, in comparison with the TMAC-based filter architecture in PNS [13] and in RNS [14] the performance of the proposed device is 7.89% -35.59% lower. The number of LUTs occupied by the proposed device is 18.08% -37.27% less compared with the filter based on Winograd method [9], but 3.83 -7.74 times more compared to other reviewed known architectures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The proposed architecture of the 8-bit filter has 2.15% lower latency, but 16-and 32-bit devices have 3.42% -52.52% more delay, compared to the known architecture based on TMAC units with computations in RNS. The area of the proposed device is approximately twice the area of a device based on TMAC units with computations in RNS [14]. The main advantage of the proposed filter architecture based on the Winograd method with calculations in RNS with special type modules is to reduce the processing time of a two-dimensional signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Image filtering implementation method in RNS with replacing the computationally complex division operation by the multiplication and scaling is developed in [62]. A high-performance hardware implementation of digital filtering using truncated multiplyaccumulate units in RNS is presented in [63]. FPGA simulation results show that the proposed RNS-based approach increases the digital filtering speed by about 4 times and reduces the hardware costs by 3 times compared to the binary number system (BNS).…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%