2012
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2011.2158778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Performance Control Strategies for Electrical Drives: An Experimental Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
188
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 420 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
188
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, the MPC-31 gives 80% higher average phase current ripple than the PI-PWM control in the experiments. This value is higher than the one given by the flux/torque control using FCS-MPC in a three-phase induction motor drive, of about 20% [23]. This is so since PI-PWM in multiphase drives can easily achieve practically zero average voltage values in all planes other than the first, while FCS-MPC always applies a single switching state, thus inevitably causing excitation of the secondary plane(s).The current ripple of FCS-MPC can be improved by using a higher sampling frequency.…”
Section: Transient Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…On average, the MPC-31 gives 80% higher average phase current ripple than the PI-PWM control in the experiments. This value is higher than the one given by the flux/torque control using FCS-MPC in a three-phase induction motor drive, of about 20% [23]. This is so since PI-PWM in multiphase drives can easily achieve practically zero average voltage values in all planes other than the first, while FCS-MPC always applies a single switching state, thus inevitably causing excitation of the secondary plane(s).The current ripple of FCS-MPC can be improved by using a higher sampling frequency.…”
Section: Transient Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…A Simulink library based on System Generator will be created, containing ready to use configurable modules for drives control, as current/speed/position controllers, SVM modules (different zero vector allocation schemes), sinusoidal PWM modules (different zero sequence signal injection schemes). Also, future work will target computationally more intensive control algorithms, like predictive controllers [41], [42], that will take full advantage of the execution speed-up by parallelization that FPGAs can offer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the vector control of the induction machines is implemented in two ways: field oriented control and direct torque control [1,2]. In case of the FOC (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%