2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High order discontinuous Galerkin discretizations with a new limiting approach and positivity preservation for strong moving shocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, based on certain Gauss-Lobatto quadratures and positivity-preserving flux, Zhang and Shu [13][14][15] used Lax-Friedrichs flux and successfully developed a positivity-preserving approach for high-order discontinuous Galerkin methods. Such an approach is also applied to unstructured meshes and p-adaptive numerical solutions by Kontzialis and Ekaterinaris [18]. In a recent paper of Wang et al [16], they simplified the method and extended it to solve gaseous detonations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, based on certain Gauss-Lobatto quadratures and positivity-preserving flux, Zhang and Shu [13][14][15] used Lax-Friedrichs flux and successfully developed a positivity-preserving approach for high-order discontinuous Galerkin methods. Such an approach is also applied to unstructured meshes and p-adaptive numerical solutions by Kontzialis and Ekaterinaris [18]. In a recent paper of Wang et al [16], they simplified the method and extended it to solve gaseous detonations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, implicit time marching for the P2 computation was necessary in order to overcome stability limitations imposed by the increase of the polynomial order expansion. For P2 or higher order accuracy, elements that were flagged for limiting according to the modified TVB limiter of Equation were set as P1, and the accuracy was increased away from them as it is shown in References . Because of high mesh resolution, there are no noticeable differences between P1 and P2 computations on the pressure contours (Figure (b) and (d) and Figure (b) and (d)).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic limiter of Equation was used and also applied in a direction to direction basis in the canonical computational domain (Figure (a)) for the standard square elements in two dimensions and the standard cubic elements in three dimensions, rather than the physical space arbitrary elements. After limiting the characteristic variables in the computational domain, the conservative variables are formed and transferred back to the physical space.…”
Section: Discontinuous Galerkin Formulation For the Navier–stokes Equmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These higher order numerical solutions were the same as the second order numerical solution mainly because the TVB limiter was activated at many discontinuities and the accuracy dropped to piecewise linear expansion when the limiter is activated. 42 …”
Section: B Brio and Wu Shock Tube Problemmentioning
confidence: 97%