2016
DOI: 10.4208/nmtma.2015.m1416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positivity-Preserving Runge-Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin Method on Adaptive Cartesian Grid for Strong Moving Shock

Abstract: Abstract. In order to suppress the failure of preserving positivity of density or pressure, a positivity-preserving limiter technique coupled with h-adaptive Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin (RKDG) method is developed in this paper. Such a method is implemented to simulate flows with the large Mach number, strong shock/obstacle interactions and shock diffractions. The Cartesian grid with ghost cell immersed boundary method for arbitrarily complex geometries is also presented. This approach directly uses the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It turns out that, to simulate this problem, only about 3.76% of effective grid resolution needs to be used by the AMR strategy. The result matches well with the same reported in the work of Liu et al…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It turns out that, to simulate this problem, only about 3.76% of effective grid resolution needs to be used by the AMR strategy. The result matches well with the same reported in the work of Liu et al…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We simulate a Mach 10 shock wave diffraction at a convex corner, which is a well‐studied benchmark problem in computational fluid dynamics. It is challenging to develop a stable numerical scheme for a high‐order RKDG due to the development of a low pressure region near to the 120 o convex corner . We consider a right‐moving Mach 10 shock initially located at x = 3.4, moving in an undisturbed fluid medium with ρ =1.4 and p =1.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To remedy this situation, several positivity‐preserving limiters are constructed by Zhang et al For the present multifluid algorithm, as the material interface is invisible in all calculations by defining ghost fluid in the GFMs, the same positivity‐preserving limiter can be directly used as in single‐fluid flow. The modified positivity‐preserving limiter developed in the work of Liu et al and used under a CFL‐like condition is adopted in this work. For any cell K , the DG polynomials U K ( x ) and its average trueboldUK are UK(x)=ρK(x),(ρu)K(x),(ρv)K(x),(ρE)K(x)T, UK=ρK,(ρutrue‾)K,(ρvtrue‾)K,(ρEtrue‾)KT.30pt To enforce the positivity of the density and pressure fields, a linear scaling limiter introduced by Liu and Osher is adopted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the CG version: calculate the mass-weighted averages using (13 by (40) and (37). Nonnegativity of the pressure p(U i ) corresponding to the final nodal values U i = (ρ i , (ρv) i , (ρE) i ) T of a continuous finite element approximation U h can be shown as in [18]. Since the pressure p(U ) is a concave function of the conserved variables, Jensen's inequality yields …”
Section: Limiting For the Euler Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%