2009
DOI: 10.1177/0269215509342330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High intertester reliability of the Cumulated Ambulation Score for the evaluation of basic mobility in patients with hip fracture

Abstract: The intertester reliability of the CAS is very high, and a change of more than 0.20 and 0.55 CAS points for the total CAS indicates a real change in basic mobility, at group level and for an individual patient, respectively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
66
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(37 reference statements)
5
66
2
Order By: Relevance
“…• getting in and out of bed (from supine in bed to sitting at the side of the bed to standing or transfer to sitting in chair placed beside the bed, and return to the supine position in bed) • sitting to standing to sitting from a chair with armrests • indoor walking, with an appropriate aid allowed in transfer and walking if necessary 32 Each activity is scored from 0 to 2 (0 = not able despite human assistance and verbal cueing, 1 = able with verbal cueing and/or human assistance from 1 or more individuals, 2 = able safely without human assistance or verbal cueing), making up a total score of 0-6 reflecting the scale from bedbound to independent mobilization. 32,33 In addition to routine treatment, a physiotherapist tested the patients after AHA surgery using CAS on PODs 1-7.…”
Section: Physical Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• getting in and out of bed (from supine in bed to sitting at the side of the bed to standing or transfer to sitting in chair placed beside the bed, and return to the supine position in bed) • sitting to standing to sitting from a chair with armrests • indoor walking, with an appropriate aid allowed in transfer and walking if necessary 32 Each activity is scored from 0 to 2 (0 = not able despite human assistance and verbal cueing, 1 = able with verbal cueing and/or human assistance from 1 or more individuals, 2 = able safely without human assistance or verbal cueing), making up a total score of 0-6 reflecting the scale from bedbound to independent mobilization. 32,33 In addition to routine treatment, a physiotherapist tested the patients after AHA surgery using CAS on PODs 1-7.…”
Section: Physical Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33 In addition to routine treatment, a physiotherapist tested the patients after AHA surgery using CAS on PODs 1-7. A total of 8 skilled physiotherapists participated in data collection.…”
Section: Physical Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with hemiarthroplasty were not allowed to perform > 90° flexion, adduction or internal rotation of the hip. Before inclusion, all of the patients followed a short in-hospital physical therapy programme without strength training, focused on the regaining of basic mobility activities [18,19] , before being discharged to their own homes. Patients were recruited from four outpatient geriatric municipality health centres from September 2010 to August 2011.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now we find that interobserver reproducibility of the A-test is very good (kappa coefficient was 0.81-0.92). By interpretation of Landis and Koch, the A-test is found in the same gradation of reproducibility as the CAS, which has the simplest scale and strong evidence of highly reliable test for recovery assessment of elderly patients with hip fracture 5 . In their intertester reliability study of the CAS, kappa coefficient was very high for all three items (0.92-0.97) 5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The Cumulated Ambulation Score (CAS) with a simple three-level ordinal scale was designed to monitor functional recovery of older people who were surgically treated for hip fractures and in this population it has excellent reliability [3][4][5] . The University of Iowa Level of Assistance Scale (ILAS) 6, 7 has a complex seven-level scale and demonstrated moderate reliability in a population of patients who underwent arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%