The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Prostate Cancer 2016
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-800077-9.00059-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in ISUP-GG in the present study when increasing the number of cores from 1 to 2 and from 2 to 3 could impact the management of patients with prostate cancer by causing a shift from active surveillance to more aggressive treatment protocols [36]. According to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, the recommended management of prostate cancer substantially differs between ISUP-GG 1 and ISUP-GG 2 or 3 [36]. We observed that core 3 had an upgrade frequency of 4.1% from ISUP-GG ≤ 1 to ≥ 2 and from ISUP-GG ≤ 2 to ≥ 3.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in ISUP-GG in the present study when increasing the number of cores from 1 to 2 and from 2 to 3 could impact the management of patients with prostate cancer by causing a shift from active surveillance to more aggressive treatment protocols [36]. According to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, the recommended management of prostate cancer substantially differs between ISUP-GG 1 and ISUP-GG 2 or 3 [36]. We observed that core 3 had an upgrade frequency of 4.1% from ISUP-GG ≤ 1 to ≥ 2 and from ISUP-GG ≤ 2 to ≥ 3.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We observed that core 3 had an upgrade frequency of 4.1% from ISUP-GG ≤ 1 to ≥ 2 and from ISUP-GG ≤ 2 to ≥ 3. These upgrades increase the likelihood of a patient being recommended for invasive treatment such as radical prostatectomy, rather than active surveillance [36]. The single upgrade that we observed on core 4 was from ISUP-GG ≤ 2 to ≥ 3 and thus also has implications for clinical management [36].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is employed as first-line treatment for metastatic prostate cancers (PCas). Unfortunately, ADT itself can promote the proliferation of castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) cells, 1 which triggers cancer recurrence. Most CRPCs are androgen receptor (AR)-positive and rely on the aberrant activation of the AR-pathway, which favors cell survival and proliferation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%