2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐impedance fault detection and classification in power system distribution networks using morphological fault detector algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, all these works, presents the identification and location of conventional fault without considering the HIF. On the other hand, the authors in and present the identification and location of HIF in power system but fail to test the robustness of the classifier for all other conventional faults and switching transients. In this case, the accuracy of identification of HIF in the system lies in the range of 70% to 100% by methods like DWT, Morphological fault detector and combination of WT with other various classifiers namely Fuzzy‐ARTMAP, Boosted decision tree, Finite element method and Extreme learning machine.…”
Section: Comparison With Literature Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, all these works, presents the identification and location of conventional fault without considering the HIF. On the other hand, the authors in and present the identification and location of HIF in power system but fail to test the robustness of the classifier for all other conventional faults and switching transients. In this case, the accuracy of identification of HIF in the system lies in the range of 70% to 100% by methods like DWT, Morphological fault detector and combination of WT with other various classifiers namely Fuzzy‐ARTMAP, Boosted decision tree, Finite element method and Extreme learning machine.…”
Section: Comparison With Literature Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2018, Moses Kavi et al [4] presented a study on the classification of power system disturbances, which include HIFs. Moreover, the MM approach was utilized by the proposed method.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the entropy of each subset, s E represents the information gain in terms of the class partition of its elements is stated in eq. (4).…”
Section: Fault Detection Using Decision Tree Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the above artificial intelligent (AI) methods using wavelet coefficients are needed to train with the pre-estimated fault conditions. Morphological fault detection algorithms were also introduced in [20,21] using arrival time, polarities and amplitudes of phase voltage and current signals, and polarities of DC component-based method [22]. But these algorithms are complicated to proceed and using polarity to detect faulty phase need to get the signals from both sides of the faulted line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%