2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78889-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-frequency sound components of high-resolution audio are not detected in auditory sensory memory

Abstract: High-resolution digital audio is believed to produce a better listening experience than the standard quality audio, such as compact disks (CDs) and digital versatile disks (DVDs). One common belief is that high-resolution digital audio is superior due to the higher frequency (> 22 kHz) of its sound components, a characteristic unique to this audio. This study examined whether sounds with high-frequency components were processed differently from similar sounds without these components in the auditory cortex.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study thus set out to present BB stimulations without any other auditory factors by using a high-frequency wave of 18,000 Hz as the baseline frequency. Stimulations using inaudible high-frequency waves generally have no significant effect on the brainwave [ 17 , 18 ] ; therefore, the effect of only BB stimulations on brainwave induction could be verified. The findings of this study are significant because the effect of only BB is determined without the potential influence of auditory perception, which has been overlooked in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study thus set out to present BB stimulations without any other auditory factors by using a high-frequency wave of 18,000 Hz as the baseline frequency. Stimulations using inaudible high-frequency waves generally have no significant effect on the brainwave [ 17 , 18 ] ; therefore, the effect of only BB stimulations on brainwave induction could be verified. The findings of this study are significant because the effect of only BB is determined without the potential influence of auditory perception, which has been overlooked in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When stimuli are presented randomly, one‐fifth of the stimuli would be expected in each phase. In a previous study using a similar participant pool and a similar experimental protocol (e.g., deviance probability of .2 and onset‐to‐onset interval of 500 ms), 1000 stimuli were presented to obtain at least 150 artifact‐free trials for deviant stimuli (Nittono, 2020). In the present study, we conducted 5000 trials, that is, five times more than in the previous study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to guidelines and previous studies (Duncan et al., 2009; Nittono, 2020), participants whose number of averaged trials either at systole or at diastole was less than 150 were excluded from the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that stimulation may have been too weak to reliably elicit a hearing impression and/or brain effects, since stimuli were applied via a loudspeaker 135 cm in front of the participants at only 60 dB SPL. Nittono [ 24 ] conducted an EEG study, in which the cortical response towards high-frequency components of high-resolution audio was compared to similar sounds without these components, yet no differences were detected. Again, since the participants’ mean HT was only 17,316 Hz and the test stimuli (a 11- and a 22-kHz high-cut sound) were delivered via loudspeakers 120 cm in front of the participants with an SPL of 62 dB, the 22-kHz stimulus may have been too weak to produce measurable effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%