2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01374-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-frequency recombination between members of an LTR retrotransposon family during transposition bursts

Abstract: Retrotransposons containing long terminal repeats (LTRs) form a substantial fraction of eukaryotic genomes. The timing of past transposition can be estimated by quantifying the accumulation of mutations in initially identical LTRs. This way, retrotransposons are divided into young, potentially mobile elements, and old that moved thousands or even millions of years ago. Both types are found within a single retrotransposon family and it is assumed that the old members will remain immobile and degenerate further.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(35 reference statements)
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because completely unrestrained and fully activated LTR retrotransposons typically generate copious life‐cycle intermediates in the form of extrachromosomal DNA (Mirouze et al ., ; Ito et al ., ), we wondered if this was also the case for MESSI . We performed tissue‐specific PCR‐free DNA‐seq and counted reads mapping to the target TEs, potentially revealing not only extrachromosomal DNA but also putative new chromosomal copies (Sanchez et al ., ). However, tomato shoot apical meristems did not show an increased number of DNA‐seq reads mapping to the very young transcriptionally activated MESSI (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because completely unrestrained and fully activated LTR retrotransposons typically generate copious life‐cycle intermediates in the form of extrachromosomal DNA (Mirouze et al ., ; Ito et al ., ), we wondered if this was also the case for MESSI . We performed tissue‐specific PCR‐free DNA‐seq and counted reads mapping to the target TEs, potentially revealing not only extrachromosomal DNA but also putative new chromosomal copies (Sanchez et al ., ). However, tomato shoot apical meristems did not show an increased number of DNA‐seq reads mapping to the very young transcriptionally activated MESSI (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To the best of our knowledge, no operative antisilencing factors have been described for LTR retrotransposons, but mounting evidence suggests that several plant retrotransposon families could override certain layers of epigenetic suppression. For instance, inductive environmental conditions activated ONSEN/COPIA78 of A. thaliana and Tnt1 of tobacco despite TGS recognition and targeting (Ito et al ., ; Hernandez‐Pinzon et al ., ; Sanchez et al ., ). Other plant retrotransposons such as RIDER of tomato, OGRE of pea, SARE A of soybean and BARE1 of barley appeared transcriptionally unrestricted – and certainly translationally competent at least in the last case – across most wild‐type tissues where the epigenetic machinery is intact (Neumann et al ., ; Jiang et al ., ; Du et al ., ; Jaaskelainen et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We consider these values as conservative estimates, and likely underestimations, as they do not account for the high rate of repeated DNA divergence. Repeats may have escaped their detection by accumulation of mutations over time, recombination, diversification, reshuffling, and decay (Ma et al, 2004, Wollrab et al, 2012, Elliott and Gregory, 2015, Sanchez et al, 2017, Bourque et al, 2018. From the extracted repeat dataset, we identified and characterised seven Chenopodium satDNAs and the 5S rRNA genes.…”
Section: Next-and Third-generation Sequence Reads Give An Overview Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because selfers reduce the spread of TEs between individuals, and, compared to outcrossers, more efficiently purge insertions with deleterious recessive effects (Morgan 2001; Wright et al 2008; Wright and Schoen 1999). Outcrossing may also increase the activity and genetic diversity of LTRs during transposition burst cycles (Sanchez et al 2017). Expectations of these models parallel those concerning genetic load in homosporous ferns (Hedrick 1987), and TEs, if deleterious, may comprise a large component of genetic load.…”
Section: Dissussionmentioning
confidence: 99%