2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1556098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-frequency permeability of thin NiFe/IrMn layers

Abstract: Magnetization reversal and magnetoresistance behavior of perpendicularly magnetized [Co/Pd]4/Au/[Co/Pd]2 nanowires J. Appl. Phys. 112, 073902 (2012) Electric-field control of CoFeB/IrMn exchange bias system J. Appl. Phys. 112, 064120 (2012) Critical effect of spin-dependent transport in a tunnel barrier on enhanced Hanle-type signals observed in threeterminal geometry Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 132411 (2012) Giant tunneling magnetoresistance in epitaxial Co2MnSi/MgO/Co2MnSi magnetic tunnel junctions by halfm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several methods to increase the uniaxial anisotropy field such as patterning thin films [3], field annealing [4], oblique deposition [5,6], employing multilayerstructure films [7], and using exchange bias effect [9][10][11][12][13][14]. When using exchange bias to obtain high FMR frequency, most groups tried to decrease the ferromagnetic (FM) thickness while keeping the antiferromagnetic (AF) thick enough so as to get the largest exchange bias field (H E ) [9][10][11][12][13][14]. This method however has a drawback that the filling ratio (t FM /t AF ) is small causing a reduction of effective permeability since the thick AF layer does not contribute to the total permeability of the film [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several methods to increase the uniaxial anisotropy field such as patterning thin films [3], field annealing [4], oblique deposition [5,6], employing multilayerstructure films [7], and using exchange bias effect [9][10][11][12][13][14]. When using exchange bias to obtain high FMR frequency, most groups tried to decrease the ferromagnetic (FM) thickness while keeping the antiferromagnetic (AF) thick enough so as to get the largest exchange bias field (H E ) [9][10][11][12][13][14]. This method however has a drawback that the filling ratio (t FM /t AF ) is small causing a reduction of effective permeability since the thick AF layer does not contribute to the total permeability of the film [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such non-uniformities may arise from differences in anisotropy between the layers, 29 from antiferromagnetic coupling, 30 or from exchange coupling, provided that these fields are much smaller than the saturation magnetization. Non-uniformities may also arise from unwanted phenomena 31 , or interfacial anisotropies.…”
Section: B Application To Soft Films With Magnetization Dispersion Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The f FMR corresponds to the change of the sign of the real permeability and it can be extracted from Eq. (1). If the resonance frequency is much larger than the width at half maximum of the loss peak, the resonance frequency also corresponds to the peak of the imaginary permeability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently, the microwave permeability spectra of F/AF bilayers have been studied in order to know the dynamic response [1][2][3][4][5][6] or to apply for the microwave devices [7]. Most of these works focused on the variations of the ferromagnetic resonance frequency (f FMR ) with exchange bias field in terms of F [1] or AF [2][3][4][5] layer thickness. In addition to the f FMR behaviour, the loss performance, which is identified by the Gilbert damping constant (α G ), is also a very import parameter for applications of micromagnetic devices at microwave frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%