SC16: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis 2016
DOI: 10.1109/sc.2016.81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Frequency Nonlinear Earthquake Simulations on Petascale Heterogeneous Supercomputers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulations are carried out using the AWP-ODC finite difference code [Olsen, 1994;Day and Bradley, 2001;Cui et al, 2010], which simulates spontaneous rupture with a traction-at-split-node method [Dalguer and Day, 2007] and accounts for Drucker-Prager plasticity using the return-map algorithm [Roten et al, 2016]. The method has been verified against several independent finite element and finite difference codes within the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) dynamic rupture code verification project [Harris et al, 2009[Harris et al, , 2011.…”
Section: Simulation Of Dynamic Rupture With Fault Zone Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulations are carried out using the AWP-ODC finite difference code [Olsen, 1994;Day and Bradley, 2001;Cui et al, 2010], which simulates spontaneous rupture with a traction-at-split-node method [Dalguer and Day, 2007] and accounts for Drucker-Prager plasticity using the return-map algorithm [Roten et al, 2016]. The method has been verified against several independent finite element and finite difference codes within the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) dynamic rupture code verification project [Harris et al, 2009[Harris et al, , 2011.…”
Section: Simulation Of Dynamic Rupture With Fault Zone Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption of isotropy seems reasonable for grain-grain contacts in gravel and maybe for pervasively cracked crystalline rock in the uppermost basement, and we lack information on inelastic anisotropy beneath PS10. The S-wave Roten et al (2014Roten et al ( , 2016Roten, Olsen, Cui, & Day, 2017;Wang et al, 2019) used this rheology in three-dimensional numerical models.…”
Section: Effective Inelastic Rheology For the Near-field Velocity Pulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Inelastic" (or "anelastic") strain from strong dynamic stresses within the flower structure dissipates energy from the near-field velocity pulse. The net effect is nonlinear attenuation (Roten et al, 2014(Roten et al, , 2016Roten, Olsen, Cui, & Day, 2017). The shaking at the surface for a given fault motion history is systematically less than it would have been had the Earth behaved elastically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, 2D dynamic rupture simulations [62,64] on planar dipping faults show that plastic deformation in the overriding wedge results in a distinct, more vertical seafloor uplift, which might enhance the tsunami caused by the earthquake. Incorporating off-fault plasticity is computationally challenging and would increase computational time by up to 50 % [75]. Finally, our model earthquake is breaking the megathrust quickly, probably due to the smoothness of the fault on geometric scales below 400 m. However, evaluating the effects of small-scale, fractal roughness requires increasing the fault mesh resolution considerably.…”
Section: Impact and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,43,48,49,72,75,76] allows for the simulation of various aspects of earthquake scenarios and enables researchers to answer geophysical questions complicated by the lack of sufficiently dense [79]. Middle: Unstructured tetrahedral mesh of the modeling domain, including refinement to resolve high-frequency wavepropagation and frictional failure on the fault system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%