2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.12.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High flux polyamide thin film composite forward osmosis membranes prepared from porous substrates made of polysulfone and polyethersulfone blends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their study showed that a ratio of 2:3 in the blend introduced a large open bottom section in the support layer and increased surface roughness which minimized ICP. However, the support layer enhanced water flux but came at the cost of also increasing solute reverse flux [162].…”
Section: Assessment Of Membrane Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study showed that a ratio of 2:3 in the blend introduced a large open bottom section in the support layer and increased surface roughness which minimized ICP. However, the support layer enhanced water flux but came at the cost of also increasing solute reverse flux [162].…”
Section: Assessment Of Membrane Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, Pebax polymer was coated on the PES‐PSf blend membrane as support layer. Indeed, PES‐PSf blend membrane depicts smaller surface pores, higher porosity, and flux when compared with porous PSf membrane . Surface modification was performed using hydrophilic TiO 2 nanoparticles to improve hydrophilicity and antifouling properties of the prepared membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the reverse solute flux was calculated by the change of NaCl concentration in the feed solution. The reverse solute flux J s (mol/ m 2 h) is determined from the increase of the feed conductivity [26]:…”
Section: Testing Of Membrane Filtration Performance In Forward Osmosimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The filtration performance of the membrane was measured by a cross flow filtration system [26][27][28] with an effective membrane area of 64.26 cm 2 . The volume of both feed and draw solutions was 4.0 L at the start of each experimental run, a 2.0 M NaCl solution was used as draw solution and the de-ionized water was used as feed solution.…”
Section: Testing Of Membrane Filtration Performance In Forward Osmosimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation