2016
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.02.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Dose Versus Conventional-Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration and Patient and Kidney Survival and Cytokine Removal in Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the development and validation cohorts were each collected in a single centre. Second, the information on the CRRT prescription such as dose, blood flow rate, and removal rate was not included in the models, but these parameters were not associated with mortality risk in the present cohort (data not shown) and previous studies have also reported that they are not significant . Third, we did not consider long‐term mortality, because the overall mortality rates were already significantly high in the 7‐day timeframe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the development and validation cohorts were each collected in a single centre. Second, the information on the CRRT prescription such as dose, blood flow rate, and removal rate was not included in the models, but these parameters were not associated with mortality risk in the present cohort (data not shown) and previous studies have also reported that they are not significant . Third, we did not consider long‐term mortality, because the overall mortality rates were already significantly high in the 7‐day timeframe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…193194195196 Much of the dosing guidelines stem from two large scale multicenter randomized controlled trials; however, these two trials were not exclusively done in the setting of SA-AKI. The Veterans Administration-NIH Acute Renal Failure Trial Network enrolled 1055 patients, 579 (54.9%) of whom had sepsis; the Randomized Evaluation of Normal versus Augmented Level (RENAL) Replacement Therapy Trial studied 1465 patients, 723 (49.3%) of whom had severe sepsis.…”
Section: Renal Replacement Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of cytokine removal by blood purification has been investigated using the interventions of extremely high volume hemofiltration (HVHF) for enhanced convective clearance, and high cut-off (HCO) membranes for enhanced diffusive clearance. Randomized controlled trials of HVHF show decreases in cytokine levels but no mortality benefit [2,3]. There is preliminary experience with HCO membranes, with reported improvements of hemodynamic parameters and oxygenation [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%