2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-016-0600-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High cost enhances cooperation through the interplay between evolution and self-organisation

Abstract: BackgroundCooperation is ubiquitous in biological systems, yet its evolution is a long lasting evolutionary problem. A general and intuitive result from theoretical models of cooperative behaviour is that cooperation decreases when its costs are higher, because selfish individuals gain selective advantage.ResultsContrary to this intuition, we show that cooperation can increase with higher costs. We analyse a minimal model where individuals live on a lattice and evolve the degree of cooperation. We find that a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most extensive work on this topic has been conducted by Hogeweg and colleagues, starting with studies of hypercycles (Boerlijst and Hogeweg, 1991; 1995) and culminating most recently in treatments of parasitism (Colizzi and Hogeweg 2016a) and the evolutionary significance of high-cost cooperation (Colizzi and Hogeweg 2016b). Related studies, of paramount significance for our current undertaking, is the work of Füchslin & McCaskill (2001) and Markowitz et al (2006) on the evolution of cell-free genetic coding in gene-replicase-translatase (GRT) systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most extensive work on this topic has been conducted by Hogeweg and colleagues, starting with studies of hypercycles (Boerlijst and Hogeweg, 1991; 1995) and culminating most recently in treatments of parasitism (Colizzi and Hogeweg 2016a) and the evolutionary significance of high-cost cooperation (Colizzi and Hogeweg 2016b). Related studies, of paramount significance for our current undertaking, is the work of Füchslin & McCaskill (2001) and Markowitz et al (2006) on the evolution of cell-free genetic coding in gene-replicase-translatase (GRT) systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Turing (1952) first showed in relational to molecular systems, elementary reaction--diffusion coupling can result in extraordinary spatio--temporal ordering, effects which rescue some intricately cooperative chemical systems from extinction. The most extensive work on this topic has been conducted by Hogeweg and colleagues, starting with studies of hypercycles (Boerlijst and Hogeweg, 1991;1995) and culminating most recently in treatments of parasitism (Colizzi and Hogeweg 2016a) and the evolutionary significance of high--cost cooperation (Colizzi and Hogeweg 2016b). Related studies, of paramount significance for our current undertaking, is the work of Füchslin & McCaskill (2001) and Markowitz et al (2006) on the evolution of cell-free genetic coding in gene--replicase--translatase (GRT) systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, genetic diversity is lost at colony frontiers, leading to a two-dimensional patterning of colonies into genetically distinct, pie-wedge-shaped sectors. This eco-evolutionary dynamic facilitates a number of interesting phenomena, such as genetic "surfing" of deleterious mutations, inhibition of spatial spread of obligate mutualists, and selection for cooperation (Hallatschek et al 2007;Excoffier and Ray 2008;Nelson 2008, 2010;Van Dyken et al 2013;Muller et al 2014;Colizzi and Hogeweg 2016). Cooperation is favored in this setting because random genetic drift increases genetic relatedness at colony boundaries, allowing strong positive genetic assortment that targets cooperative benefits to cooperators, while depriving defectors access to cooperative goods, and also allowing cooperator-rich sectors to outpace and overtake neighboring defector sectors in a "survival of the fastest" (Van Dyken et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%