2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2013.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High carbohydrate–low protein consumption maximizes Drosophila lifespan

Abstract: Dietary restriction extends lifespan in a variety of organisms, but the key nutritional components driving this process and how they interact remain uncertain. In Drosophila, while a substantial body of research suggests that protein is the major dietary component affecting longevity, recent studies claim that carbohydrates also play a central role. To clarify how nutritional factors influence longevity, nutrient consumption and lifespan were measured on a series of diets with varying yeast and sugar content. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
116
7
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
14
116
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, an addition of 10% sucrose reduces the number of eggs by less than 50% (Bass et al 2007), whereas 10% ethanol drops fecundity to near zero in both bacterial treatments. Second, increasing dietary sugar typically increases fly lifespan (Galenza et al 2016;Bruce et al 2013;Lee et al 2008), whereas our study found that ethanol has a negative effect on lifespan regardless of whether bacteria are present (although this trend is only apparent at high ethanol concentrations for the bacterially-colonized treatment). Third, we found that ethanol does not lead to the typical tradeoff between lifespan and fecundity observed by varying nutrients (Zera & Harshman 2001;Djawdan et al 1996) -instead we found that ethanol decreases both components of fitness (Figures 1 and 2).…”
Section: Ethanol As a Toxincontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Specifically, an addition of 10% sucrose reduces the number of eggs by less than 50% (Bass et al 2007), whereas 10% ethanol drops fecundity to near zero in both bacterial treatments. Second, increasing dietary sugar typically increases fly lifespan (Galenza et al 2016;Bruce et al 2013;Lee et al 2008), whereas our study found that ethanol has a negative effect on lifespan regardless of whether bacteria are present (although this trend is only apparent at high ethanol concentrations for the bacterially-colonized treatment). Third, we found that ethanol does not lead to the typical tradeoff between lifespan and fecundity observed by varying nutrients (Zera & Harshman 2001;Djawdan et al 1996) -instead we found that ethanol decreases both components of fitness (Figures 1 and 2).…”
Section: Ethanol As a Toxincontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…n = 658 flies, C; 482, D; 598, C to D switch; 500, C + H 2 O; 621, C to C + H 2 O switch. (D) In a paradigm varying carbohydrate:protein ratio, which affects lifespan in a nutrient-dependent manner (43,44), an acute switch from HP to LP diet results in an intermediate trajectory consistent with the deceleration model and similar in nature to-albeit milder than-the effect of temperature (B). All postswitch trajectories are significantly different (Table S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fly food was prepared as described previously (43,44). The concentrated (C) diet contained 10% yeast extract and 10% sucrose, while the diluted (D) diet contained 2.5% yeast extract and 2.5% sucrose, both in 1% agar (all wt/vol).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, it is now accepted that, the caloric content being constant, the proteins/carbohydrates ratio modulates lifespan, for instance in Drosophila melanogaster flies (e.g. Vigne and Frelin, 2007ab, Lee et al, 2008, Bruce et al, 2013, Zajitschek et al, 2013 and in mice (Solon-Biet et al, 2014). Therefore, the mainstream hypothesis to explain the positive effect of dietary restriction (DR) on lifespan, when observed, is now more subtle than it was, because it deals with the ratio of nutrients rather than simply with the number of calories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%