2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-capacity, nanofiber-based ion-exchange membranes for the selective recovery of heavy metals from impaired waters

Abstract: This contribution describes the development, performance evaluation and modeling of polyelectrolyte-modified nanofiber membranes for heavy metal recovery from impaired water. High-capacity membranes were prepared by grafting poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) and poly(itaconic acid) (PIA) to cellulose nanofiber mats. The success of polymer grafting was confirmed by attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Membrane permeabilities for a series of polymer grafted nanofiber membranes were measur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many well-known processes regarding the treatments of contaminated wastewaters like membrane filtration, 1-4 chemical precipitation, [5][6][7] electrocoagulation, [8][9][10][11][12] reverse osmosis, [13][14][15] adsorbtion, [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] ion exchange, [25][26][27] etc., all of them with their inherent advantages and disadvantages. At the same time, most of them are not suitable for developing countries due to huge cost investment in terms of use of chemicals, infrastructure, and operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many well-known processes regarding the treatments of contaminated wastewaters like membrane filtration, 1-4 chemical precipitation, [5][6][7] electrocoagulation, [8][9][10][11][12] reverse osmosis, [13][14][15] adsorbtion, [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] ion exchange, [25][26][27] etc., all of them with their inherent advantages and disadvantages. At the same time, most of them are not suitable for developing countries due to huge cost investment in terms of use of chemicals, infrastructure, and operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removing these contaminants from industrial wastewaters before effluents are discharged into the aquatic environment is obviously necessary. Various methods, such as biological processes [2], ultrasound [3], active carbon adsorption [4], ozone treatment [5], coagulation/flocculation [6], and ion exchange resin [7,8] and ion exchange membrane adsorption methods [9], have been investigated in an attempt to remediate dye-containing wastewaters. However, these methods are not always efficient and economical enough, so new alternative technologies that rely on low-cost materials are mandatory to solve the issues related to dye-containing wastewaters [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Until now, many technologies have been adopted for Cd(II) decontamination from wastewater discharge. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Among these technologies, adsorption is the most used method because of its flexibility in design and operation, efficiency, and economy in practice. 13 Consequently, the use of an economical adsorbent is a crucial issue for the development of the adsorption method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%