2016
DOI: 10.1364/oe.24.009053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-accuracy reference standards for two-photon absorption in the 680–1050 nm wavelength range

Abstract: Degenerate two-photon absorption (2PA) of a series of organic fluorophores is measured using femtosecond fluorescence excitation method in the wavelength range, λ2PA = 680-1050 nm, and ~100 MHz pulse repetition rate. The function of relative 2PA spectral shape is obtained with estimated accuracy 5%, and the absolute 2PA cross section is measured at selected wavelengths with the accuracy 8%. Significant improvement of the accuracy is achieved by means of rigorous evaluation of the quadratic dependenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
113
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
113
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior is characteristic of strongly dipolar chromophores, where parity selection rules do not apply . Note that for 8 and 20 , where the NLT data is directly compared to the 2PEF measurement, the spectral shapes are closely matched, but the absolute cross‐section value obtained by NLT appears as a factor 1.5–2 higher, even though both methods used fluorescein in pH 11 aqueous buffer as 2PA reference standard . This discrepancy may be related to the absorption from the excited state, which effectively increases the NLT response but does not affect directly the 2PEF signal .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior is characteristic of strongly dipolar chromophores, where parity selection rules do not apply . Note that for 8 and 20 , where the NLT data is directly compared to the 2PEF measurement, the spectral shapes are closely matched, but the absolute cross‐section value obtained by NLT appears as a factor 1.5–2 higher, even though both methods used fluorescein in pH 11 aqueous buffer as 2PA reference standard . This discrepancy may be related to the absorption from the excited state, which effectively increases the NLT response but does not affect directly the 2PEF signal .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-photon absorption studies:A ll photophysical studies were performed with freshly prepared air-equilibrated solutions at room temperature (298 K). Two-photon-excited fluorescence (TPEF) cross sections were measured using the method described by Xu and Webb [31] and the appropriate solvent-related refractive index corrections. [31c] To span the l = 690-980 nm range, aN d:YLF-pumped Ti :sapphire oscillator was used, generating 150 fs pulses at a 76 MHz rate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-photon absorption (TPA) properties of dyes 13, 14, 16,a nd 18 were measured by meanso ft wo-photon excited fluorescencee xperiments in solution. [31] Measurements were conducted in the 690-1100 nm range (i.e.,f irst biological spectral region or NIR1). The very low solubility in toluene, or low fluorescenceq uantum yields in alternative solvents in which these dyes show good solubility,p recluded measurements for dyes 15 and 17.T he two-photon absorption spectra are shown in Figure 5a nd Figure S12 (Supporting Information) along with corresponding rescaled one-photon absorption spectra,w hereas the corresponding data are listedi nT able 2.…”
Section: Two-photon Absorption Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Laser excitation wavelength was 811 nm; the beam was collimated to a diameter of 2 mm. Sample luminescence was collected with a 1-mm diameter optical fiber and directed to an Ocean Optics USB-4000 spectrometer.…”
Section: Absolute Cross Section Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dependence of the emission intensity of [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ and W(CNAr) 6 complexes on laser power at λ = 847.6 nm, displayed on a logarithmic scale. Each data set was fit to a linear function, with slopes varying from m = 1.7-2.3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%