2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchy of factors affecting behavioural signs used for oestrus detection of Holstein and Normande dairy cows in a seasonal calving system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
27
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
27
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…anxiety, which was detected more frequently for cows in the loose-housing system. One reason of the differences observed could be that more female-female interactions are expressed by loosehoused cows staying close to each other in sexually active groups (Cutullic et al, 2009;Sveberg et al, 2013). Furthermore, in theory STBM and mounting can only be expressed in the loose-housing systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…anxiety, which was detected more frequently for cows in the loose-housing system. One reason of the differences observed could be that more female-female interactions are expressed by loosehoused cows staying close to each other in sexually active groups (Cutullic et al, 2009;Sveberg et al, 2013). Furthermore, in theory STBM and mounting can only be expressed in the loose-housing systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Stevenson et al, 1983). The positive relationship between OI and CR may be due to higher oestrogen levels, higher quality and fertilization ability of an oocyte and/or better AI to ovulation timing at higher OI (Harper, 1994;Cutullic et al, 2009;Stevenson et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-E-mail: catherine.disenhaus@agrocampus-ouest.fr level over lactation decreased milk yield (MY) and increased body condition (BC) loss, remarkably improved oestrus detection signs (Cutullic et al, 2009b) and had no significant effect on conception rates at inseminations and on final pregnancy rates (Delaby et al, 2009). In that study, the positive effects of a low MY may have overcome the negative effects of a large BC loss and a low body condition score (BCS) on reproduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Los factores que afectan la tasa de servicio han sido menos estudiados que aquellos que afectan la fertilidad (Cutullic et al, 2009). Entre los factores que influyen sobre la tasa de servicio se encuentran la pobre expresión del celo (Stevenson, 2001), fallas en la detección de celos, problemas de salud reproductiva periparto, tipo de suelo, movimiento de animales dentro del hato, número de ordeños, número de parto, nivel productivo y estrés calórico (Lopez et al, 2004;Cutullic et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Entre los factores que influyen sobre la tasa de servicio se encuentran la pobre expresión del celo (Stevenson, 2001), fallas en la detección de celos, problemas de salud reproductiva periparto, tipo de suelo, movimiento de animales dentro del hato, número de ordeños, número de parto, nivel productivo y estrés calórico (Lopez et al, 2004;Cutullic et al, 2009). Por otro lado, se disponen de protocolos hormonales de sincronización de celo con inseminación a tiempo fijo y uso de prostaglandinas (PG) que reemplazan la detección de celo (Stevenson, 2001; Bartolome y Thatcher, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified