2018
Hierarchical NiMoS and NiFeS Nanosheets with Ultrahigh Energy Density for Flexible All Solid‐State Supercapacitors
Abstract: Highly flexible supercapacitors (SCs) have great potential in modern electronics such as wearable and portable devices. However, ultralow specific capacity and low operating potential window limit their practical applications. Herein, a new strategy for the fabrication of free-standing NiMoS and NiFeS nanosheets (NSs) for high-performance flexible asymmetric SC (ASC) through hydrothermal and subsequent sulfurization technique is reported. The effect of Ni 2+ is optimized to attain hierarchical NiMoS and …
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
264
34
19
4
Citation Types
7
116
0
0
Year Published
2018
2027
Publication Types
Select...
301
5
1
1
Relationship
8
300
Authors
Journals
Cited by 307 publications
(123 citation statements)
References 54 publications
7
116
0
0
“…The maximum capacities of Electrodes I and III are much lower and can only reach 309 mA h/g (371 µA h/cm 2 ) and 324 mA h/g (453 µA h/cm 2 ), respectively, over 25% and 21% lower than that of Electrode II. Notably, the specific capacity of our homogeneous architecture here is favorably comparable with those of previously reported nanostructures, including CoMoO 4 @Co(OH) 2 core-shell structures (265 mA h/cm 2 at 2 mA/cm 2 ) [46], as well as CoMoO 4 nanoflakes (32.40 mA h/g; 492.48 µAh/cm 2 ) [47], Ni–Mo–S nanosheets (312 mA h/g at 1 mA/cm 2 ) [48], and flower-like Mn–Co oxysulfide (136 mA h/g at 2 A/g) [49]. Detailed comparisons in electrochemical performances among these devices and our structure can be found in Table S1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The maximum capacities of Electrodes I and III are much lower and can only reach 309 mA h/g (371 µA h/cm 2 ) and 324 mA h/g (453 µA h/cm 2 ), respectively, over 25% and 21% lower than that of Electrode II. Notably, the specific capacity of our homogeneous architecture here is favorably comparable with those of previously reported nanostructures, including CoMoO 4 @Co(OH) 2 core-shell structures (265 mA h/cm 2 at 2 mA/cm 2 ) [46], as well as CoMoO 4 nanoflakes (32.40 mA h/g; 492.48 µAh/cm 2 ) [47], Ni–Mo–S nanosheets (312 mA h/g at 1 mA/cm 2 ) [48], and flower-like Mn–Co oxysulfide (136 mA h/g at 2 A/g) [49]. Detailed comparisons in electrochemical performances among these devices and our structure can be found in Table S1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Peaks at 55.1 and 53.8 eV are assigned to 3d 3/2 and 3d 5/2 of Se 3d. [ 21–23,26 ] The above‐discussed XPS results indicated the formation of 1T‐Mn x Mo 1− x S 2− y Se y and were found in accordance with the other reported literatures. [ 10,13–18 ]…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…[ 10,13–18 ] GCD curves for the 1T‐Mn x Mo 1− x S 2− y Se y at different current densities (1 to 50 mA cm −2 ) showed a near symmetric nature in charging and discharging time (Figure 4E) justifying the excellent coulombic efficiency of the electrode. [ 10–19,22–26 ] The highest potential window in the GCD curve at current density 1 mA cm −2 for MoS 2 was found to be ≈0.36 V (similar to the other reported literature of MoS 2 ) [ 24 ] and remained similar for 1T‐Mn x Mo 1− x S 2− y Se y too (Figure 4E) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…3a shows the strong peaks at 858.38 and 875.88 eV with the binding energy difference of 17.5 eV in Ni-Mo-S@CC, corresponding to the low band of Ni 2p 3/2 and high band of Ni 2p 1/2 , respectively, consistent with the previous reports [32]. The intense satellite peak suggested that the Ni 2+ state was predominant in the Ni 2p spectra [33]. After electrodepositing metal Fe, a slight negative shift of about 0.96 eV can be found in the binding energy of Ni 2p 3/2 (857.42 eV) and Ni 2p 1/2 (874.92 eV) for Fe/Ni-Mo-S@CC compared with those for Ni-Mo-S@CC, con rming the electron transfer from Fe metal to Ni in Ni-Mo-S. After electrodepositing metal Ni, a slight negative shift of about 1.31 eV can be found in the low band of Ni 2p 3/2 (857.07 eV) for Ni/Ni-Mo-S@CC compared with that of Ni-Mo-S@CC, con rming the electron transfer from Ni metal to Ni in Ni-Mo-S. Identically, the Ni 2p peaks in NiFe/Ni-Mo-S@CC show negative shift of 1.63 eV compared with that of Ni-Mo-S@CC, demonstrating the strong electron interaction between NiFe and Ni-Mo-S.…”
Section: Structure and Morphology Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
