2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.103345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical MCo2O4@Ni(OH)2 (M = Zn or Mn) core@shell architectures as electrode materials for asymmetric solid-state supercapacitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Co 0.5 –Ni 3 S 2 //AC asymmetric device exhibits a maximum energy density of 60.3 W h kg −1 (20 mA cm −2 ) at a power density of 1944.3 W kg −1 (50 mA cm −2 ) and 36.0 W h kg −1 at a power density of 4309 W kg −1 . The energy ( E , W h kg −1 ) and power densities ( P , W kg −1 ) are calculated based on the discharge curve using Equations (4) and (5), respectively [ 78 ]: where, I , , m , and t are the discharge current (mA), integral area under the discharge curve, masses, and discharging time (s), respectively. The results are comparable or even superior to those of previously reported supercapacitors ( Table 2 ), such as the rGO@Ni 3 S 2 //AC (37.19 W h kg −1 at 399.9 W kg −1 ), Ni 3 S 2 //AC (36 W h kg −1 at 400 W kg −1 ), and Ni 3 S 2 @CoS//AC (23.69 W h kg −1 at 268.95 W kg −1 ) devices [ 66 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Co 0.5 –Ni 3 S 2 //AC asymmetric device exhibits a maximum energy density of 60.3 W h kg −1 (20 mA cm −2 ) at a power density of 1944.3 W kg −1 (50 mA cm −2 ) and 36.0 W h kg −1 at a power density of 4309 W kg −1 . The energy ( E , W h kg −1 ) and power densities ( P , W kg −1 ) are calculated based on the discharge curve using Equations (4) and (5), respectively [ 78 ]: where, I , , m , and t are the discharge current (mA), integral area under the discharge curve, masses, and discharging time (s), respectively. The results are comparable or even superior to those of previously reported supercapacitors ( Table 2 ), such as the rGO@Ni 3 S 2 //AC (37.19 W h kg −1 at 399.9 W kg −1 ), Ni 3 S 2 //AC (36 W h kg −1 at 400 W kg −1 ), and Ni 3 S 2 @CoS//AC (23.69 W h kg −1 at 268.95 W kg −1 ) devices [ 66 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Co 0.5 -Ni 3 S 2 //AC asymmetric device exhibits a maximum energy density of 60.3 W h kg −1 (20 mA cm −2 ) at a power density of 1944.3 W kg −1 (50 mA cm −2 ) and 36.0 W h kg −1 at a power density of 4309 W kg −1 . The energy (E, W h kg −1 ) and power densities (P, W kg −1 ) are calculated based on the discharge curve using Equations ( 4) and (5), respectively [78]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,45 Figure 5c shows a typical linear relationship for both the peak current (anodic/cathodic) densities versus (scan rate) 1/2 as achieved upon varying the scan rates by the Ni−Co−Se, Ni−Co−S, and Ni−Co−P electrodes, indicating their dominant diffusion-controlled redox reaction process. 4,56 The GCD profiles of Ni−Co−Se NAs and other samples for a fixed operating voltage regime of 0−0.45 V are plotted in Figures 5d and S14b,d, and f. The symmetric pattern of the GCD curves of TMCs and TMP indicates a highly reversible charge−discharge feature with good Coulombic efficiencies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is reported that NC is an excellent negative material due to its large surface area, high electron conductivity, and good electrochemical properties. 4,8 The NC negative electrode exhibited a deviated-rectangular feature within the voltage window of −1.0 to 0.0 V, featuring the electrical double-layer capacitive nature accompanied by a slight pseudocapacitive nature (Figure S17), whereas the Ni− Co−Se NAs delivered noticeable redox peaks within the window regime of −0.2 to 0.75 V, demonstrating its typical battery-like feature. 27 Therefore, the Ni−Co−Se NAs//NC hybrid device could have the potential to deliberately enlarge the working voltage window, thereby improving the energy density (Figure S17c).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the mechanism occurs at the electrode, the structure, quality, and nature of the electrode engage in a vital role for better supercapacitor performance . Therefore, different varieties of electrode materials like metal/metal oxides, , layered doubled hydroxides, , MXenes, , metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), MXene and MOF composites, transition metal dichalcogenide, polymers, composites of transition metal oxides with 3D graphene materials or porous carbon nanofibers, and composite of metal oxides/sulfides/phosphides/nitrides/selenides have been recently designed to achieve high-density supercapacitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%