“…Regarding the debate on whether ASD is associated with a global processing deficit, some studies suggested that global processing is not impaired but less preferred in ASD, because whether the processing is impaired or enhanced depends on a default preference to processing local information, or instruction of allocation of attention (Happé & Booth, 2008; Plaisted et al, 1999). Evidence shows that individuals with ASD exhibited better performance on the local than the global information when they were instructed to attend to both the local and global levels (Plaisted et al, 1999), or given a free‐choice (Koldewyn et al, 2013); however, when they were instructed to attend to either local or global information, they showed comparable performance on attentive information, no matter what level it was (Plaisted et al, 1999; Van der Hallen et al, 2017). Therefore, the global deficit has been interpreted as a disinclination, rather than a disability in ASD (Koldewyn et al, 2013).…”