Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1772690.1772892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical cluster visualization in web mapping systems

Abstract: This paper presents a technique for visualizing large spatial data sets in Web Mapping Systems (WMS). The technique creates a hierarchical clustering tree, which is subsequently used to extract clusters that can be displayed at a given scale without cluttering the map. Voronoi polygons are used as aggregation symbols to represent the clusters. This technique retains hierarchical relationships between data items at different scales. In addition, aggregation symbols do not overlap, and their sizes and the number… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to note that all of the above chunking and organizing methods have adopted the hierarchical design approach because this allows for the expansion and easy addition of new context types and properties. This is consistent with the findings from Delort (2010) who suggested a tree structure to organize clusters of spatial data in interactive maps. This review also shows different ways of organizing information based on a single context type such as user profile or location (Levandoski et al, 2010;Pires et al, 2010).…”
Section: Chunking and Organizing Of Information By Semanticssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is interesting to note that all of the above chunking and organizing methods have adopted the hierarchical design approach because this allows for the expansion and easy addition of new context types and properties. This is consistent with the findings from Delort (2010) who suggested a tree structure to organize clusters of spatial data in interactive maps. This review also shows different ways of organizing information based on a single context type such as user profile or location (Levandoski et al, 2010;Pires et al, 2010).…”
Section: Chunking and Organizing Of Information By Semanticssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Previous works propose map designs based on a spatial aggregation of event data and the graphic representation of these aggregates, to alleviate this problem. (Delort, 2010, Meier, 2016. This aggregation can be performed according to the spatial distance between data (two events are aggregated together if the distance between their locations or the graphic distance between their representations on the map is below a specific threshold), or according to a spatial grid (all events covered by a grid's cell are aggregated together).…”
Section: The Role Of Map Design For the Visual Identification Of Structures In Event Data Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The marker cluster uses a grouping approach: if the density of markers is too high in a specified area, the markers are grouped and replaced by a cluster object (Fig. 2.1) (Delort, 2010b;Leaflet, 2014;Mahe & Broadfoot, 2010). As a result of the clustering, it is required to introduce a new visual entity to the map that differentiates the cluster object from the single markers.…”
Section: Marker Clustermentioning
confidence: 99%