2019
DOI: 10.1111/coa.13435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hidden hearing loss and tinnitus: Utility of the high‐definition audiograms in diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique may risk missing the hearing loss over a narrow frequency bandwidth, known as HHL (22). Lefeuvre et al (32) assessed hearing loss in 66 tinnitus patients with frequency accuracy and intensity accuracy at 1 dB HL using definition audiograms ranging from 1/24 octave to 1 Hz. The outcomes revealed that HHL was detected in 81.8% of the tinnitus patients; HHL was not detected in the volunteers without tinnitus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique may risk missing the hearing loss over a narrow frequency bandwidth, known as HHL (22). Lefeuvre et al (32) assessed hearing loss in 66 tinnitus patients with frequency accuracy and intensity accuracy at 1 dB HL using definition audiograms ranging from 1/24 octave to 1 Hz. The outcomes revealed that HHL was detected in 81.8% of the tinnitus patients; HHL was not detected in the volunteers without tinnitus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No absolute correlation between hearing loss and tinnitus was demonstrated since, as recently proposed, a mild hearing impairment could be present in patients with tinnitus and yet be missed by a standard pure tone audiogram (PTA) measured at octave or half octave intervals from 250 to 8,000 Hz (Xiong et al, 2019). Thus, a strong audiological evaluation would require a high definition audiogram with the study of high frequencies (Liberman et al, 2016;Lefeuvre et al, 2019), DPOAE (Xiong et al, 2019) and the threshold equalizing noise (TEN) test between 500 and 4 kHz (Kara et al, 2020) to detect hidden hearing loss and synaptopathy. Also, as proposed by Simoes et al (2019), neuroticism and extraversion might be relevant markers of tinnitus distress over time and may be used to statistically distinguish patient groups with clinically relevant changes of tinnitus distress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence or absence of hearing loss is usually clinically determined through pure tone audiometry (PTA) at octave frequencies between 125 and 8,000 Hz. Nevertheless, it is possible that the hearing loss exists at extended high frequencies or between two tested frequencies (Vielsmeier et al, 2015;Lefeuvre et al, 2019;Xiong et al, 2019), despite normal hearing in the range 125-8,000 Hz. Additionally, since audiometry only assesses sensitivity, it does not capture deficits in supra thresholds processing.…”
Section: General Individual Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed previously, hearing assessment often involves only standard PTA. However, a more comprehensive hearing assessment, including higher frequency resolution and extended high frequencies, would benefit tinnitus profiling as it would provide higher sensitivity for auditory system impairments (Vielsmeier et al, 2015;Lefeuvre et al, 2019;Xiong et al, 2019). Besides PTA, numerous other audiological tests can be used for a more in depth characterization of hearing function, including speech in noise audiometry, immittance tympanometry, acoustic reflex assessment, auditory brainstem responses (ABR), otoacoustic emissions (mainly distortion product otoacoustic emissions [DPOAE]), and loudness discomfort levels.…”
Section: Hearing Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%