2022
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.828299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Worldwide Tinnitus Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Published Literature Between 2001 and 2020

Abstract: BackgroundIn recent years, tinnitus has attracted increasing research interest. However, bibliometric analysis of global research on tinnitus is rare. The objective of this study was to identify and describe the foci and developing trends of tinnitus research using a bibliometric approach.MethodsPublications related to tinnitus published from 2001 to 2020 were searched for in the Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCI-E) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) databases in the Web of Science Core Collection of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard clinical categories were used to group scores: none/minimal, 0%-16%; mild/moderate, 17%-42%; and severe, 43%-100%. 63,64 Ratings of mild/moderate or greater handicap are considered clinically actionable, with patients referred for available interventions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Standard clinical categories were used to group scores: none/minimal, 0%-16%; mild/moderate, 17%-42%; and severe, 43%-100%. 63,64 Ratings of mild/moderate or greater handicap are considered clinically actionable, with patients referred for available interventions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were asked to complete the Tinnitus Primary Function Questionnaire if they self-reported ‘tinnitus’ through two questions as described in Appendix 1. Similar to prior reports and uses, 63,64 and for consistency with the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults categorization, three categories of severity are used: none/minimal, 0%-16%; mild/moderate, 17%-42%; and severe, 43%-100%.Concentration (C), emotion (E), hearing (H), and sleep (S) domain scores are the means of the respective five domain items. Each item has a possible score of 0-100.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bibliometric analysis is a method of using mathematical and statistical techniques to analyze books, articles, and other literature for a general understanding of a new field. It is also a tool to explore the structure and trends of a topic through visualization and statistics for a quantitative assessment of the impact of research literature on selected research areas, countries/regions, research collaborations, journals, institutions, and authors in a given period [5,6]. Compared with traditional systematic reviews and meta-analyses, bibliometric analysis can reveal key issues and developments in the field of interest more systematically and intuitively, thereby guiding future research [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citespace and VOSviewer ( Synnestvedt et al, 2005 ; van Eck and Waltman, 2010 ) were used by bibliometric ( Chen, 2004 ) analysis to track disciplinary development and explore the application of knowledge in specific medical fields ( Zhou et al, 2022 ). Presently, the literature on mandibular defects has not been used to summarize the development trend.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%