2010
DOI: 10.1175/2010jtecho720.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HF Radar Performance in a Low-Energy Environment: CODAR SeaSonde Experience on the West Florida Shelf*

Abstract: Three long-range (5 MHz) Coastal Ocean Dynamics Application Radar (CODAR) SeaSonde HF radars overlooking an array of as many as eight moored acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) have operated on the West Florida Shelf since September 2003 for the purpose of observing the coastal ocean currents. HF radar performance on this low-energy (currents and waves) continental shelf is evaluated with respect to data returns, the rms differences between the HF radar and the ADCP radial currents, bearing offsets, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can explain the significant scatter found in the literature concerning point to point comparison between HFR and other in situ measurements. When HFR data are compared with surface drifter clusters or ADCPs whose uppermost bins are not deeper than 5 m, RMSDs typical values range between 3 and 12 cm.s −1 (e.g., Ohlmann et al, 2007;Molcard et al, 2009;Liu et al, 2010;Kalampokis et al, 2016). Each row corresponds to one of the ITU frequency bands allocated for oceanographic radar with the lower and upper band limits in frequency.…”
Section: Basic Principles Of Hfr Operation and Data Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can explain the significant scatter found in the literature concerning point to point comparison between HFR and other in situ measurements. When HFR data are compared with surface drifter clusters or ADCPs whose uppermost bins are not deeper than 5 m, RMSDs typical values range between 3 and 12 cm.s −1 (e.g., Ohlmann et al, 2007;Molcard et al, 2009;Liu et al, 2010;Kalampokis et al, 2016). Each row corresponds to one of the ITU frequency bands allocated for oceanographic radar with the lower and upper band limits in frequency.…”
Section: Basic Principles Of Hfr Operation and Data Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wave signals sent from radar stations in the high frequency band 3~30 MHz can receive feedback from wind-driven gravity waves of surface water when ocean waves' wavelengths are exactly half the wavelength of the broadcast radio [40][41][42]. Radar stations record radial surface currents; a single radar station determines the radial component of the surface currents relative to that station, providing current magnitudes and directions toward or away from that radar station.…”
Section: Hfr Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many works the limitations of HF radars with respect of vertical resolution is complemented by ADCP observations (e.g., Paduan and Rosenfeld, 1996;Shay et al, 1998). As demonstrated by Shay et al (2007) and Liu et al (2010) mapping surface currents combined with ADCP data serves as a strong component of monitoring and prediction systems for coastal ocean. This dominating trend in developing coastal observatories is implemented in the framework of the integrated coastal observing system for the German Bight COSYNA.…”
Section: Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%