2009
DOI: 10.1080/00207540802577979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heuristic procedures for solving the general assembly line balancing problem with setups

Abstract: The General Assembly Line Balancing Problem with Setups (GALBPS) was recently defined in the literature. It adds sequence-dependent setup time considerations to the classical Simple Assembly Line Balancing Problem (SALBP) as follows: whenever a task is assigned next to another at the same workstation, a setup time must be added to compute the global workstation time, thereby providing the task sequence inside each workstation. This paper proposes heuristic procedures, based on priority rules, for solving GALBP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They formulate a binary linear program and propose priority-rule-based and GRASP procedures. A large number of additional priority-rule-based procedures are developed and examined by Martino and Pastor (2009). Futhermore, see Arcus (1966), Wilhelm (1999) as well as Bautista and Pereira (2002).…”
Section: The Setup Assembly Line Balancing and Scheduling Problem (Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They formulate a binary linear program and propose priority-rule-based and GRASP procedures. A large number of additional priority-rule-based procedures are developed and examined by Martino and Pastor (2009). Futhermore, see Arcus (1966), Wilhelm (1999) as well as Bautista and Pereira (2002).…”
Section: The Setup Assembly Line Balancing and Scheduling Problem (Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a basic result, it could be established for SALBP and SUALBSP as well that the station-oriented scheduling scheme is to be preferred to the task-oriented one (cf. Scholl and Voß, 1996;Martino and Pastor, 2009). Both scheduling schemes order tasks by priority rules and successively assign available tasks, i.e., tasks whose predecessors have already been assigned.…”
Section: Priority Rule Based Procedures (Prbp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of constraints (16) determines the proper orderings within any three tasks, i.e., if task i has been performed before task k and task k has been performed before task j, then task i would be performed before task j. The number of necessary performing orders between tasks in any workstation is calculated by the constraint set (17). The set of constraints (18) guarantees that each task in any workstation would have at most one immediate successor.…”
Section: B Ijmnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, constraints (23) and (24) determine the backward and forward setup operations in any workstation, respectively. We note that the constraints (17), (23) and (24) are semi-linear due to the absolute value. A way of linearising these constraints are given in Appendix B.…”
Section: B Ijmnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation