2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2003.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous reduction of uranyl by micas: Crystal chemical and solution controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
77
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
5
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The bulk of the data was determined by XPS of edge and basal plane orientations. Some of our results have been reported in Ilton et al (2003) and Ilton and Simmons (2003). However, we made three unexpected discoveries that have expanded the possible pathways for sorption-reduction: 1) XAS has shown that uranyl may be reduced in the interlayer region, 2) XPS yielded evidence that pentavalent uranium is stabilized on the mica edge orientations, and 3) HRTEM recorded the presence of U/Fe-rich nano-scale zones on interior basal surfaces.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…The bulk of the data was determined by XPS of edge and basal plane orientations. Some of our results have been reported in Ilton et al (2003) and Ilton and Simmons (2003). However, we made three unexpected discoveries that have expanded the possible pathways for sorption-reduction: 1) XAS has shown that uranyl may be reduced in the interlayer region, 2) XPS yielded evidence that pentavalent uranium is stabilized on the mica edge orientations, and 3) HRTEM recorded the presence of U/Fe-rich nano-scale zones on interior basal surfaces.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…This process may be significant in that, As sorption (and to a lesser extent Pb, and U) with Fe-rich phases (including but not limited to clays) appears to play a major role in As fate in the shallow subsurface at Chimayo. Localized structural site-tosite electron exchange has been shown to be potentially significant related to sorption-reduction of U (Ilton et al, 2004;Singer et al, 2009;Chakraborty et al, 2010), and may be significant for several other redox-sensitive elements (Peterson et al, 1997;Felmy et al, 2011). While this process has been shown by Chakraborty et al (2011) to not be as significant for As on phases such as biotite, it could have additional impacts on how to predict controls on metal mobility in the Chimayo system in general.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 More generally, the availability of Fe(II) at the mineral-water interface, either as the result of adsorption or in surface sites, can impact the extent of U(VI) reduction, ranging from complete to partial reduction. 13,[16][17][18][19][20][21] Studies to date have provided U(VI) reduction rates for a wide range of solution conditions and mineral characteristics. However, a molecular-scale view of the process is lacking.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%