2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a robust geochemical and reactive transport model to evaluate possible sources of arsenic at the CO2 sequestration natural analog site in Chimayo, New Mexico

Abstract: a b s t r a c tMigration of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) from deep storage formations into shallow drinking water aquifers is a possible system failure related to geologic CO 2 sequestration. A CO 2 leak may cause mineral precipitation/dissolution reactions, changes in aqueous speciation, and alteration of pH and redox conditions leading to potential increases of trace metal concentrations above EPA National Primary Drinking Water Standards. In this study, the Chimayo site (NM) was examined for site-specific impacts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
75
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase of TE concentration in solution is evidenced, and sorption does not balance this release in solution in most cases, despite an available SSA that is much higher than the SSA that will be available in a real storage site. Even in a real storage context, the dissolution is supposed to be lower than what we observe in those experiments, due to aquifer flow, non negligible amounts are thought to be mobilized (Viswanathan et al, 2012;Zheng et al, 2009;Wigand et al, 2008) when one considers the huge volume of injected CO 2 that is envisaged (Lu et al, 2012;Rempel et al, 2011). To fill this gap in our knowledge, more experimental studies must be carried out to understand more the real behavior of those TE in CO 2 storage conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The increase of TE concentration in solution is evidenced, and sorption does not balance this release in solution in most cases, despite an available SSA that is much higher than the SSA that will be available in a real storage site. Even in a real storage context, the dissolution is supposed to be lower than what we observe in those experiments, due to aquifer flow, non negligible amounts are thought to be mobilized (Viswanathan et al, 2012;Zheng et al, 2009;Wigand et al, 2008) when one considers the huge volume of injected CO 2 that is envisaged (Lu et al, 2012;Rempel et al, 2011). To fill this gap in our knowledge, more experimental studies must be carried out to understand more the real behavior of those TE in CO 2 storage conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Another study (Viswanathan et al, 2012) points out that in the specific context of their study, As is mobilized in the aqueous phase and that, despite sorption and/or reprecipitation, an amount of this As remains in solution. What we observe in the experiments presented here demonstrates that this mobilization effect also exists for elements such as zinc, manganese and Mean diameter ( m) μ Figure 7 St-Emilion carbonate mercury injection data comparison for initial carbonate, and reacted powder at 30, 60, and 90 bar of CO 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mobilization of arsenic in a shallow groundwater aquifer due to CO 2 leakage has been investigated at one of the natural analog sites, Chimayó, New Mexico, where CO 2 -saturated brackish water was leaked into the shallow aquifer along the fault [7,13,24,25]. At this site, decreased pH and the resulting mobilization of trace metals, including arsenic, were observed.…”
Section: Geofluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if their adverse effects had been alleviated due to the high buffering capacity of the local groundwater aquifer, Keating et al [7] reported significantly elevated trace metal concentrations at a number of local wells due to the influx of brackish waters. Later, both Keating et al [13] and Viswanathan et al [24] integrated the field dataset into a multiphase reactive transport model to understand the behavior of arsenic, since some wells in Chimayó exceeded the maximum contamination level (MCL). In addition to studies targeting natural CO 2 release sites, several experiments have been conducted at field-scale CO 2 injection sites to determine secondary contamination caused by the injected CO 2 [11,[26][27][28].…”
Section: Geofluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%