2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2926500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous Market Structure and Systemic Risk: Evidence from Dual Banking Systems

Abstract: This paper investigates how banking system stability is affected when we combine Islamic and conventional finance under the same roof. We compare systemic resilience of three types of banks in six GCC member countries with dual banking systems: fully-fledged Islamic banks (IB), purely conventional banks (CB) and conventional banks with Islamic windows (CBw). We employ market-based systemic risk measures such as MES, SRISK and CoVaR to identify which sector is more vulnerable to a systemic event. We also comput… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, a comparative analysis of competition and stability relationship is presented for Islamic and conventional banks operating alongside each other in dual banking system. Hence, this study we complement the works of Abedifar et al (2013), Abedifar et al (2017), Beck et al (2013), Hasan and Dridi (2011), Khan et al (2020) and Mollah and Zaman (2015). These studies provide comparative analyses of financial stability, risk management, performance, and efficiency between these two types of banks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Second, a comparative analysis of competition and stability relationship is presented for Islamic and conventional banks operating alongside each other in dual banking system. Hence, this study we complement the works of Abedifar et al (2013), Abedifar et al (2017), Beck et al (2013), Hasan and Dridi (2011), Khan et al (2020) and Mollah and Zaman (2015). These studies provide comparative analyses of financial stability, risk management, performance, and efficiency between these two types of banks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As most of the Islamic countries are trying to develop an Islamic financial system, our results provide important insights whether competition between FFIBs and Islamic window banks is linked with the individual bank performance as well as the financial system as a whole. Second, our study complements the works of Abedifar et al (2013), Beck et al (2013), Abedifar et al (2017) and Khan et al (2020). These studies presented a comparative analysis of competition and performance relationship for Islamic and conventional banks operating alongside each other in a dual banking system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This study contributes to the literature in two ways. First, it extends the broad literature on risk in Islamic banking (Abedifar et al, 2013;Beck et al, 2013;Mollah et al, 2015;Abedifar et al, 2017;Khan et al, 2020), by investigating how the risk-taking of Islamic banks is differently affected by corruption compared to their conventional counterparts. Specifically, this study examines the role of SSBs as a channel to moderate the effect of corruption on the risk-taking of Islamic banks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, the LLPs and NPLs both backward-looking proxies for credit risk are also used. These three proxies are widely used in the literature as accounting-based credit risk indicators (for example, Sila et al, 2016;Abedifar et al, 2017;.…”
Section: Alternative Measures Of Bank Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%