2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous hypergraph embedding for document recommendation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, there are also a few approaches studying the hypergraph embedding problem, but they either focus on a n-uniform hypergraph (where all hyperedges contain a fixed number n of nodes) and thus capture only fixed-n-wise node proximity [2,31,44], or learn from hyperedges for heterogeneous event only (hyperedges linking nodes from different data domains) while ignoring edges within a data domain [14]. However, in this paper, as shown in Figure 1, our LBSN hypergraph contains both classical friendship edges (n=2) within the user domain and check-in hyperedges (n=4) across all four data domains.…”
Section: Graph Embeddingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, there are also a few approaches studying the hypergraph embedding problem, but they either focus on a n-uniform hypergraph (where all hyperedges contain a fixed number n of nodes) and thus capture only fixed-n-wise node proximity [2,31,44], or learn from hyperedges for heterogeneous event only (hyperedges linking nodes from different data domains) while ignoring edges within a data domain [14]. However, in this paper, as shown in Figure 1, our LBSN hypergraph contains both classical friendship edges (n=2) within the user domain and check-in hyperedges (n=4) across all four data domains.…”
Section: Graph Embeddingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though a hypergraph can be transformed into a classical graph by breaking each hyperedge into multiple classical edges, such an irreversible process causes a certain information loss, leading to degraded performance of the learnt node embeddings on different tasks (see Section 5.2 and 5.3 for more detail). Second, there are also a few techniques studying the hypergraph embedding problem, but they either focus on a n-uniform hypergraph (where all hyperedges contain a fixed number n of nodes) and thus capture only fixed-n-wise node proximity [2,31,44], or learn from hyperedges for heterogeneous events only (hyperedges linking nodes from different data domains) while ignoring edges within a data domain [14]. However, as shown in Figure 1, the LBSN hypergraph typically contains both classical friendship edges (n=2) within the user domain and check-in hyperedges (n=4) across all four data domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyper2vec [13] introduce a flexible random walk model on hyper-networks in a semi-supervised setting. HHE [37] utilizes eigenvectors to find the optimal solution and learn the subspace representations, but the computational cost is a vital problem. HGE [33] designs an objective function for hyperedges to make involved node representations close to each other, but the model is not flexible for hyper-networks with different structures.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [36] learned the distributional word representation model by mixed word embeddings to explore semantic relations for users. By incorporating various relations among users, tags and resource, Zhu et al [37] proposed a novel heterogeneous hypergraph embedding framework for document recommendation. Based on user and item interaction graph, Dai et al [38] proposed a novel deep coevolutionary network model to capture complex mutual relationship between users and items, and their evolution.…”
Section: Similar Relationship Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%