Heterogeneous carbonylation of dimethyl ether to methyl acetate over bifunctional catalysts containing Rh and heteropoly acids

Abstract

The carbonylation of dimethyl ether to methyl acetate was carried out in a high-pressure flowed fix-bed reaction system over heterogeneous halide-free catalysts. The TG curves indicated that solid 12-tungstosilicic acid had a crystal structure (with six crystallization waters) identical to that of solid 12-tungstophosphoric acid, although they had different number of protons in molecules. The BET surface areas greatly increased by Cs substitution in H 4 SiW 12 O 40 , and Cs 3 HSiW 12 O 40 showed a BET surface area of 206 m 2 g -1 . For the DME carbonylation at 473 K on 1 MPa under a CO/DME flow rate ratio of 18, Cs 3 HSiW 12 O 40 showed a DME conversion (6.7 %) higher than that over Cs 2 HPW 12 O 40 (4.6 %) because Cs 3 HSiW 12 O 40 had a larger surface area. Cs 3 HSiW 12 O 40 and Cs 2 HPW 12 O 40 showed high selectivity for methyl acetate of (98.0 and 97.5 %). By adding 1.0 wt% Rh in Cs 3 HSiW 12 O 40 , the DME conversion greatly increased from 6.7 to 30.8 % because a multiplier effect occurred between Rh and heteropoly acid. Rh/Cs 3 HSiW 12 O 40 showed a higher catalytic performance than those over the reported Rh/Cs 2 HPW 12 O 40 and Rh/H-MOR for the carbonylation. The DME conversion increased with increasing Rh loading from 0 to 1.0 wt% but became almost constant when Rh loading ranged from 1.5 to 3.0 wt% over Rh/Cs 3 HSiW 12 O 40 . With increasing the CO/DME ratio from 1.8 to 45, the DME conversion increased from 0.9 to 99.4 % over Rh/Cs 3 HSiW 12 O 40 at 473 K under 1 MPa. The 1 wt% Rh/Cs 3 HSiW 12 O 40 catalyst showed an initial DME conversion of 30.8 % (after 5 min on stream) but the DME conversion decreased to 23.3 % after 5 h on stream at 473 K on 1 MPa under a CO/DME flow rate ratio of 18.

Spacial hindrance induced recovery of over-poisoned active acid sites in pyridine-modified H-mordenite for dimethyl ether carbonylation

“…Currently, the process of MA hydrogenation to ethanol is well-developed, with a high activity and selectivity for ethanol synthesis [17]. However, traditional carbonylation catalysts generally have disadvantages such as environmental pollution, high cost, and short catalyst lifetime, limiting further industrial applications [10,18,19].…”