Heterogeneity and Time

Abstract

Although heterogeneity and time are central aspects of economic activity, it was predominantly the Austrian School of economics that emphasized these two aspects. In this paper we argue that the explicit consideration of heterogeneity and time is of increasing importance due to the increasing environmental and resource problems faced by humankind today. It is shown that neo-Austrian capital theory, which revived Austrian ideas employing a formal approach in the 1970s, is not only well suited to address issues of structural change and of accompanying unemployment induced by technical progress but also can be employed for an encompassing ecological-economic analysis demanded by ecological economics. However, complexity, uncertainty, and real ignorance limit the applicability of formal economic analysis. Therefore, we conclude that economic analysis has to be supplemented by considerations of political philosophy. He has published in capital theory, the valuation of ecosystem goods and services, structural change, decisions under uncertainty, and intertemporal decision making and discounting. The authors are grateful to Kate Farrell and Thomas Peterson for valuable comments on an earlier draft.

Review of Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services and Realization Approaches in China

“…During the same period, international ecologists proposed the theory of emergy analysis for the quantitative analysis of environmental resource values and the complex relationships among ecosystems and economic and social systems [44]. In the past two decades, emergy evaluation has become an important method for ecosystem service valuation methods besides alternative cost, conditional value, market value, and benefit conversion methods [45,46]. The emergy analysis method draws on the advantages of traditional economics and ecology methods, and solves the problem of not being able to account for energy between different service types, while also solving the problem of integrating and accounting for energy, material, and value flows, opening up a new direction for quantitative research on ecological economic systems, and becoming one of the most commonly used methods in ecological capital and ecosystem service value evaluation studies [47].…”

Climate Change: What Should Liberals Do?

“…From a liberal policy standpoint it would also be essential that such climate policy frameworks outline a commitment toward rules maintaining the integrity of marketoriented coordinative mechanisms and institutions (e. g. property rights, functioning relative prices, freedom of contract, economic openness). Considering the significant adjustments to be made to capital and production structures in order to respond effectively to climate change (Faber and Winkler 2006), sound framework policies providing greater certainty to entrepreneurs, investors and other productive actors to adopt climate-friendly production processes and technologies will be vital.…”