“…Conventional methods for thia‐Michael reactions involve the addition of a free thiol to a Michael acceptor in the presence of a strong base as the catalyst . More recently, numerous reagents and catalysts, including Brønsted acids [e.g., NH 4 Cl, B(OH) 3 , and Tf 2 NH (Tf=trifluoromethanesulfonyl)], Lewis acids [e.g., BF 3 ⋅ OEt 2 , ZrCl 4 , Hf(OTf) 4 , Cu(BF 4 ) 2 ⋅ x H 2 O, Zn(ClO 4 ) 2 ⋅ 6H 2 O, InBr 3 , Bi(NO 3 ) 3 , FeCl 3 , VO(OTf) 2 , and Ln(OTf) 3 (Ln=lanthanide)], heterogeneous catalysts [e.g., HBF 4 ‐SiO 2 , HClO 4 ‐SiO 2 , silica nanoparticles, and zeolite], ionic liquids, and other reagents [e.g., I 2 , H 2 O, N‐heterocyclic carbenes, ceric ammonium nitrate (CAN), and tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBA‐OH)], have been developed for carbon‐sulfur bond formation reactions (Scheme a). Although numerous methods exist to efficiently perform thia‐Michael additions, one disadvantage is that the thiol group has a propensity toward slow oxidation towards disulfide formation under ambient conditions.…”