Herrschaft, Familie Und Selbstverständnis in Der Moskoviter r uS' Des 16. Jahrhunderts Und Das Skazanie o kNjazjach Vladimirskich

Soldat, Cornelia

doi:10.1163/187633101x00208

Russ Hist

2001

DOI: 10.1163/187633101x00208

|View full text |Cite

Herrschaft, Familie Und Selbstverständnis in Der Moskoviter r uS' Des 16. Jahrhunderts Und Das Skazanie o kNjazjach Vladimirskich

Cornelia Soldat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2005

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent0

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…40 In the topos of "gosudar´ ukazal, a bojare prigovorili," the emphasis does not lay on the ukaz of the ruler, but on the consultation, the talks and advice, and last but not least on the consensus of the counseling boyars. 41 What to do now with an evil tsar? Iosif's answer is simple: do not obey him and become a martyr.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The limits of Muscovite autocracy

Soldat¹

2005

monderusse

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The relations between the grand prince and the boyars in the light of iosif Volotskii's ProsvetitelĆ ornelia SOLDAT Édition électronique Référence électronique Cornelia SOLDAT, « The limits of Muscovite autocracy », Cahiers du monde russe [En ligne], 46/1-2 | 2005, mis en ligne le 01 janvier 2007, Consulté le 20 avril 2019. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/monderusse/8801 ; DOI : 10.4000/monderusse.8801 © École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris.Cet article est disponible en ligne à l'adresse : http:/ / www.cairn.info/ article.php?ID_ REVUE=CMR&ID_ NUMPUBLIE=CMR_ 461&ID_ ARTICLE=CMR_ 461_ 0 265 The limit s of Muscovit e aut ocracy. The relat ions bet ween t he grand prince and t he boyars in t he light of iosif Volot skii' s Prosvet it elṕ ar Cornelia SOLDAT | Edit ions de l'EHESS | Cahi er s du monde r usse 2005/ 1-2 -Vol 46 ISSN 1252-6576 | ISBN 2713220556 | pages 265 à 276 Pour cit er cet art icle : -SOLDAT C. , The limit s of Muscovit e aut ocracy. The relat ions bet ween t he grand prince and t he boyars in t he light of iosif Volot skii' s Prosvet it el´, Cahi er s du monde r usse 2005/ 1-2, Vol 46, p. 265-276.Distribution électronique Cairn pour les Editions de l'EHESS. © Editions de l'EHESS. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays. La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit de l'éditeur, en dehors des cas prévus par la législation en vigueur en France. Il est précisé que son stockage dans une base de données est également interdit. Cahiers du Monde russe, 46/1-2, Janvier-juin 2005, p. 265-276. CORNELIA SOLDAT THE LIMITS OF MUSCOVITE AUTOCRACY The relations between the Grand Prince and the boyars in the light of Iosif Volotskii's ProsvetitelẂhat I want to cover under the issue of "the relations between the Grand Prince and the boyars" is the problem of absolute or autocratic power of Muscovite rulers in the sixteenth century and the powerlessness of their boyars, calling themselves their "slaves." 1 Since Sigismund Herberstein's sixteenth-century assessment it was a common assumption in European Muscovitica that the Muscovite tsar ruled as a "master," and by implication "tyrant," over his subjects who referred to themselves as his slaves (russ. kholopy) and were to appear at his court every day in order to prostrate themselves before him. As Marshall Poe has recently shown, no Western book on Muscovy lacks this description of the allegedly patrimonial and cruel relationship between tsar and boyars. 2 In the eighteenth century, Montesquieu described Muscovite Tsarism as despotism, and in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries the regalian salutation "kholop" advanced to a full patrimonial theory of Muscovite society holding...

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The limits of Muscovite autocracy

Soldat¹

2005

monderusse

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Herrschaft, Familie Und Selbstverständnis in Der Moskoviter r uS' Des 16. Jahrhunderts Und Das Skazanie o kNjazjach Vladimirskich

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

The limits of Muscovite autocracy

The limits of Muscovite autocracy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About