2003
DOI: 10.1002/vis.319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heritage presentation through interactive storytelling: a new multimedia database approach

Abstract: This paper discusses the rationale for—and describes the methodology of—a new system of interactive storytelling being developed by the Ename Centre for Public Archaeology Heritage Presentation in Belgium. Based on 5 years' experience with multimedia heritage presentation systems, both on‐site and in museum contexts, this approach to the presentation of history and archaeology enables visitors to create their own ‘stories’ as they explore the information contained in a database. The collaborative virtual envir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, much of this is pre-occupied with access to, and dissemination of, academically or professionally produced records and visualisations, again as exemplified by the London Charter (see section on 'access'). A number of projects have made significant advances in developing forms of archiving and presentation that facilitate active visitor/public engagement (King et al 2016, 90-93), of which the Ename project was an early pioneer with its focus on interactive, collaborative storytelling (Pletinckx et al 2003). Yet, even in such cases, the production of the digital data and visualisations involved remains predominantly in the hands of academic researchers or museum and heritage professionals, aided by interpreters, designers and digital technologists.…”
Section: The Accord Project: Research Practices and Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, much of this is pre-occupied with access to, and dissemination of, academically or professionally produced records and visualisations, again as exemplified by the London Charter (see section on 'access'). A number of projects have made significant advances in developing forms of archiving and presentation that facilitate active visitor/public engagement (King et al 2016, 90-93), of which the Ename project was an early pioneer with its focus on interactive, collaborative storytelling (Pletinckx et al 2003). Yet, even in such cases, the production of the digital data and visualisations involved remains predominantly in the hands of academic researchers or museum and heritage professionals, aided by interpreters, designers and digital technologists.…”
Section: The Accord Project: Research Practices and Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as cultural heritage is concerned, in literature there are different examples showing how storytelling techniques can be profitably used for engaging students while learning. The techniques used can be different, relating the different fragments of the narrations to photos and videos [12], real environments [13] and virtual representations [14]. As far as the latter ones are concerned, most examples are focused on the delivery of linear and nonlinear stories rather than on authoring tools.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus on usability and various means of interacting with the electronic guides in museums and memory institutions are presented in various cases in [10,11]. Rocchi et al [12] focus also on the concept of multi-platform publishing deploying multiple types of clients.…”
Section: State-of-the-art In Context-aware Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%