2020
DOI: 10.5040/9781350059801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heritage Formation and the Senses in Post-Apartheid South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others are, surprisingly, still absent, or marginal, while they are featured more prominently in adjacent disciplines such as folklore. The senses, in general, have not found a comfortable home in heritage studies, preventing each culture from being approached on its own sensorial terms ; but see Jethro 2020).…”
Section: What Now?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others are, surprisingly, still absent, or marginal, while they are featured more prominently in adjacent disciplines such as folklore. The senses, in general, have not found a comfortable home in heritage studies, preventing each culture from being approached on its own sensorial terms ; but see Jethro 2020).…”
Section: What Now?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I therefore argue for attention to be paid to the sensory politics contained within competing discourses and practices of religion in public spaces. Much as the post-apartheid state sought to link its authority and heritage claims to sensory calibration (Jethro 2020), the emerging radical politics around student protest movements and against neoliberalism have also entailed a sensory contestation. This chapter thus treats the examples described above as instances of competing ethical and political claims to selfhood, sensory propriety and the nation.…”
Section: Religious Nationalism In a Post-apartheid Neoliberal Momentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were often painful and difficult, described as the struggle of a centralizing impulse attempting to pull highly diverse societies together under an ill‐fitting political entity (Scott, 1998). The ways in which aesthetics and ideas have been coopted into nation‐ and state‐building projects have illustrated this, with competing cultural, linguistic and historical approaches used to define ‘authentic’ statehoods (Jethro, 2020; Tendi, 2010; Vogel, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%