2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Here today, gone tomorrow? Revisiting the stability of teachers' achievement goals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
23
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we observed moderate stability of goals over time (r = .50-.71) with masterybased goals being descriptively slightly less stable than performance-based goals, having slightly more variability in professional learning time and gains over time (r = .35-53), and a rather strong temporal stability of burnout/engagement levels (r = .78). 6 The stability of achievement goals for research over six months was in a similar range to that typically observed when investigating the stability of achievement goals of other populations over time (e.g., Janke & Dickhäuser, 2018; Praetorius et al, 2014;Senko, Hulleman, & Harackiewicz, 2011), indicating that goals contain temporally stable as well as variable aspects (Jagacinski, Kumar, Boe, Lam, & Miller, 2010; Tuominen-Soini, Salmela-Aro, & Niemivirta, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, we observed moderate stability of goals over time (r = .50-.71) with masterybased goals being descriptively slightly less stable than performance-based goals, having slightly more variability in professional learning time and gains over time (r = .35-53), and a rather strong temporal stability of burnout/engagement levels (r = .78). 6 The stability of achievement goals for research over six months was in a similar range to that typically observed when investigating the stability of achievement goals of other populations over time (e.g., Janke & Dickhäuser, 2018; Praetorius et al, 2014;Senko, Hulleman, & Harackiewicz, 2011), indicating that goals contain temporally stable as well as variable aspects (Jagacinski, Kumar, Boe, Lam, & Miller, 2010; Tuominen-Soini, Salmela-Aro, & Niemivirta, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Lastly, our findings show a moderate stability of goals over six months, implying that they contain a substantial portion of stable, personal fractions while at the same time also being variable (Bürger & Schmitt, 2017;Corker, Donnellan, & Bowles, 2013;Fryer & Elliot, 2007;Praetorius et al, 2014). This affirms that the achievement goal approach is sensible to describe actual differences between researchers in their motivations, while enabling practical implications (based on their goals being able to change).…”
Section: P R E P R I N Tmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…B. Janke et al, 2015;Praetorius et al, 2014). Diese Arbeiten indizierten, dass das Zielstreben von Lehrkräften stabile sowie variable Anteile hat, von denen angenommen werden kann, dass sie auf stabile Charakteristika der Person (z.…”
Section: Stabilität Und Veränderbarkeit Der Lehrkraft-zieleunclassified
“…B. aktuelles Interesse) oder des Kontexts (z. B. Lerngelegenheit) zurückgeführt werden können (Praetorius et al, 2014). Dies fügt sich unmittelbar in die Abgrenzung aktueller Motivation und motivationaler Tendenzen im vorgeschlagenen Rahmenmodell der Lehrkraftmotivation in Abbildung 1 ein.…”
Section: Stabilität Und Veränderbarkeit Der Lehrkraft-zieleunclassified
“…Numerous studies have shown substantial stability as well as situational variability in goal orientation (Fryer and Elliot, 2007; Husemann et al, 2007; Praetorius et al, 2014). Transitions into new contexts also seem to have a particularly strong influence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%