2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Herbicide, fertilization, and planting density effects on intensively managed loblolly pine early stand development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional costs may need to be considered associated with indirect N 2 O emissions (e.g., leaching and volatilization) to fully account the environmental costs of fertilizer application (De Klein et al, 2006). These costs may substantially add up given the large amounts of N needed to sustain expedited tree growth (e.g., 100 kg N ha −1 year −1 ; Borders & Bailey, 2001; Coyle et al, 2016; Ferreira et al, 2020; Lee & Jose, 2005), but particularly since tree fertilizer‐N uptake can be less than 50% of the N input during periods of stand development (Albaugh et al, 2008; Aubrey et al, 2012; Raymond et al, 2016). In SRWCs, the impact of silvicultural activities per unit of captured C is likely more intense than traditional forestry since C accumulation in the living biomass is short‐lived and forest floor and soil C accretion are more strongly dependent upon management (Mayer et al, 2020).…”
Section: Environmental Cost Of Srwcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional costs may need to be considered associated with indirect N 2 O emissions (e.g., leaching and volatilization) to fully account the environmental costs of fertilizer application (De Klein et al, 2006). These costs may substantially add up given the large amounts of N needed to sustain expedited tree growth (e.g., 100 kg N ha −1 year −1 ; Borders & Bailey, 2001; Coyle et al, 2016; Ferreira et al, 2020; Lee & Jose, 2005), but particularly since tree fertilizer‐N uptake can be less than 50% of the N input during periods of stand development (Albaugh et al, 2008; Aubrey et al, 2012; Raymond et al, 2016). In SRWCs, the impact of silvicultural activities per unit of captured C is likely more intense than traditional forestry since C accumulation in the living biomass is short‐lived and forest floor and soil C accretion are more strongly dependent upon management (Mayer et al, 2020).…”
Section: Environmental Cost Of Srwcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altogether, one can argue that N‐fixation and interspecific N cycling can only be increased until a certain extent and may be particularly limited during early stand development. Increasing N availability through N fixation during early forest development may be most critical and cost‐effective because trees respond positively to fertilization (Ferreira et al, 2020) and expedited early growth may persist throughout a rotation (Coyle et al, 2008, 2016; Subedi & Fox, 2016). However, fertilizer‐uptake efficiency is relatively low (Aubrey et al, 2012), which can generate significant N losses (Lee & Jose, 2005).…”
Section: Ecological Interactions In Mixed‐species Production Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These intensive silvicultural treatments were designed to achieve high yields over a short rotation (10-12 green tons acre À1 year À1 at a rotation age of 10-12 years). These silvicultural treatments are detailed further in the report by Griffiths et al (2018) and Ferreira et al (2020Ferreira et al ( , 2021.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species makes up more than 50% of the standing pine volume in the region (Baker & Langdon, 1990; Little & Viereck, 1971) and is one of the strongest sinks of CO 2 in the continental United States (400–<700 g C m −2 year −1 ) (Novick et al, 2015). Loblolly pine responds positively to fertilization and herbicide amendments throughout its entire short rotations (Coyle et al, 2016; Ferreira et al, 2020), making it an ideal candidate for bioenergy production (Griffiths et al, 2018). These faster‐growing short‐rotation woody crops might offer greater potential as sources of bioenergy and carbon sequestration but, in doing so, also trade water for carbon (Jackson et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since soil fertility is generally lower in pine plantations throughout the southern US, thus, fertilization and thinning practices can significantly increase loblolly pine production (Allen et al 2005;Coyle et al 2016;Kline and Coleman 2010;Martin and Jokela 2004). Studies have also shown that multiple herbicide and fertilizer applications with proper planting density can improve productivity in loblolly pine plantations (Ferreira et al 2020;Jokela et al 2004Jokela et al , 2010.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%