2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00885.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Herbicide application and direct drilling improves establishment and yield of chicory and plantain

Abstract: The herbs chicory ( C ichorium intybus L.) and plantain ( P lantago lanceolata L.) are increasingly popular summer forage cropping options for dairy producers. However, the impact of different establishment methods on their productivity is largely unknown. Four establishment methods for chicory and plantain crops sown into non‐cultivated ryegrass pastures in spring were compared. Establishment methods included direct‐drilling or broadcasting seed into existing pastures, with or without herbicide applicatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternative forages, such as chicory (CH; Cichorium intybus L.) and plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.) present an opportunity to improve the FA composition of milk whilst meeting environmental and economic requirements in pastoral livestock systems. Chicory has long been considered a useful component of the pastoral system in temperate regions [12], providing benefits of improved mineral nutrition [13,14] and producing a large amount of high-quality summer feed compared to RGWC when sown as monoculture or in diverse swards [15][16][17]. Chicory contains more readily fermentable carbohydrates (non-fibre carbohydrates; NFC) than ryegrass/white clover (Lolium perenne L./Trifolium repens L.; RGWC) herbage [18], which may increase the concentration of total VFA and lower rumen pH during ruminal fermentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative forages, such as chicory (CH; Cichorium intybus L.) and plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.) present an opportunity to improve the FA composition of milk whilst meeting environmental and economic requirements in pastoral livestock systems. Chicory has long been considered a useful component of the pastoral system in temperate regions [12], providing benefits of improved mineral nutrition [13,14] and producing a large amount of high-quality summer feed compared to RGWC when sown as monoculture or in diverse swards [15][16][17]. Chicory contains more readily fermentable carbohydrates (non-fibre carbohydrates; NFC) than ryegrass/white clover (Lolium perenne L./Trifolium repens L.; RGWC) herbage [18], which may increase the concentration of total VFA and lower rumen pH during ruminal fermentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collins and McCoy, ; Kunelius and MacRae, ; Li and Kemp, ) and to a lesser extent for ribwort plantain (Sanderson et al ., ,b). These two species are high yielding relative to many other forbs (Labreveux et al ., ) and are included in some commercial forage mixtures, for instance, in New Zealand dairy pastures (Glassey et al ., ), but agronomic information on other forbs is sparse. In particular, quantitative data from field trials carried out during the growing season on potential dry‐matter (DM) yield and feed value of non‐leguminous forbs relative to grasses and the main forage legumes, and in relation to environmental factors, are lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Análisis nutricional según variedades de achicoria. 25% vs. un 20% de Glassey et al (2013), lo cual nos permite sugerir que los datos de Glassey et al (2013), tienen que ser de plantas más maduras, o que su análisis fue realizado en una etapa mas tardía del cultivo. Sin embargo, al compararlos en energía metabolizable, los datos son similares a los aportados por Sepúlveda et al (2011).…”
Section: Análisis Nutricional Por Cultivarunclassified
“…Al referirnos al contenido de cenizas totales de los cv en estudio, no existen marcadas diferencias, puesto que al compararlos con Sepúlveda et al (2011), las diferencias son de 5%. No obstante Glassey et al (2013) entregan en su estudio contenidos de cenizas totales cercanas al 14%, lo que refleja diferencias de 2% con el contenido de cenizas totales (12%) obtenidas en este estudio.…”
Section: Análisis Nutricional Por Cultivarunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation