2018
DOI: 10.3897/bdj.6.e22757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Herbarium collection of the Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden (RB), Brazil

Abstract: BackgroundThis paper provides a quantitative and general description of the Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden herbarium (RB) dataset. Created over a century ago, the RB currently comprises ca. 750,000 mounted specimens, with a strong representation of Brazilian flora, mainly from the Atlantic and Amazon forests. Nearly 100% of these specimens have been entered into the database and imaged and, at present, about 17% have been geo-referenced. This data paper is focused exclusively on RB's exsiccatae collection of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also critical to keep globally unique identifiers for each digitized specimen (Güntsch et al, 2017), facilitating consistent access to information and data gathering by biodiversity portals and aggregators (Berendsohn et al, 2011). Some examples of digitization efforts include iDigBio (Paul, Mast, Riccardi, & Nelson, 2013), the Botanic Garden of Rio de Janeiro (Lanna et al, 2018), and German herbaria (Borsch et al, 2020). Some trends and future directions involve the use of artificial intelligence to automate parts of the digitization workflow, such as the automated identification of herbarium specimens using deep learning methods (Carranza-Rojas, Goeau, Bonnet, Mata-Montero, & Joly, 2017).…”
Section: Data Planning and Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also critical to keep globally unique identifiers for each digitized specimen (Güntsch et al, 2017), facilitating consistent access to information and data gathering by biodiversity portals and aggregators (Berendsohn et al, 2011). Some examples of digitization efforts include iDigBio (Paul, Mast, Riccardi, & Nelson, 2013), the Botanic Garden of Rio de Janeiro (Lanna et al, 2018), and German herbaria (Borsch et al, 2020). Some trends and future directions involve the use of artificial intelligence to automate parts of the digitization workflow, such as the automated identification of herbarium specimens using deep learning methods (Carranza-Rojas, Goeau, Bonnet, Mata-Montero, & Joly, 2017).…”
Section: Data Planning and Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As listas de espécies podem ter caráter local, regional (Zappi et al 2011;Lopes et al 2014;Zappi et al 2016;Sores-Lopes et al 2016b), ou geopolítico municipal (Almeida 2018;Cardoso 2019), estadual (Dutra et al 2015), ou para um país (Forzza et al 2010;BFG 2015;. Também podem apresentar a representatividade de coleções biológicas (Lanna et al 2018) e/ou visando grupos taxonômicos (Fernandes et al 2015;Almeida et al 2016;Teixeira et al 2016;Silva et al 2015;Ribeiro 2018;Ribeiro et al 2018a;. Independente da escala ou o foco que se dão, os objetivos dos checklists são apresentar: (i) as espécies que ocorrem em uma determinada região, (ii) riqueza e diversidade do grupo em questão, (iii) ampliação da distribuição, (iv) lacunas de coletas e diminuição do viés do déficit Linneano e Wallaceano (Thomas et al 2012;Cardoso et al 2017;Antonelli et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…2,700 specimens) and ethnobotany (RBetno – ca. 200 specimens) (Forzza et al 2016, Lanna et al 2018). Data used in the present work were acquired in the RB Herbarium collections and exhibit a historical series encompassing approximately 130 years (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%