2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01083.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatitis C infection among Dutch haemophilia patients: a nationwide cross‐sectional study of prevalence and antiviral treatment

Abstract: Summary.  Hepatitis C is a major co‐morbidity among patients with haemophilia who received inadequately or non‐virus‐inactivated clotting factor concentrates before 1992. The objectives of this study were to investigate the prevalence of hepatitis C and the use of antiviral therapies during the last decade among patients with haemophilia in the Netherlands. We performed a cross‐sectional study and a questionnaire was sent to all 1519 patients known with haemophilia in the Netherlands between 2001 and 2002. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(56 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the prevalence of HCV exposure was higher in patients with more severe bleeding disorders as a result of increased exposure to contaminated blood products. The prevalence of HCV in our haemophilia population was 72% among patients with haemophilia A or B of all severities and is similar to that reported in the Netherlands (68%) , the UK (76%) and Brazil (63%) , but lower than that reported in an American population (89%) . There are limited publications concerning HCV prevalence in patients with other bleeding disorders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As expected, the prevalence of HCV exposure was higher in patients with more severe bleeding disorders as a result of increased exposure to contaminated blood products. The prevalence of HCV in our haemophilia population was 72% among patients with haemophilia A or B of all severities and is similar to that reported in the Netherlands (68%) , the UK (76%) and Brazil (63%) , but lower than that reported in an American population (89%) . There are limited publications concerning HCV prevalence in patients with other bleeding disorders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Furthermore, ESLD did not occur in patients with a SVR, whereas the cumulative incidence was 13% in those unsuccessfully treated 15 years after completing therapy, underscoring the importance of antiviral therapy. However, there are still many hemophilic patients with chronic hepatitis C who have not been treated [18]. Current guidelines recommend treatment in all patients with HCV genotype 2 and 3 [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of these studies have been limited by a small number of patients treated, a short follow‐up, and experience with PegIFN and ribavirin has not yet been reported in peer reviewed publications. Data on response to IFN‐based therapies are of importance for both physicians and patients, as the majority of hemophilia patients with chronic hepatitis C have received no or suboptimal treatment [18]. In the present multicenter study, the response to initial IFN‐based therapy in a large cohort of patients with inherited bleeding disorders was assessed and determinants associated with response were identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although treatment success for hepatitis C has improved over the years, the majority of patients with bleeding disorders have refused therapy, at least in the Netherlands [13]. Most patients fear side effects or expect a low efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although patients with bleeding disorders generally have been offered treatment, at least in the Netherlands, most of them have declined therapy because of expected side effects, relatively low efficacy (generally HCV genotype 1), and an absence of symptoms of hepatitis C [13]. To determine whether therapy is strongly indicated, individual assessment of fibrosis is necessary, especially in patients with genotype 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%