Key Points• The inhibitor incidence in nonsevere hemophilia A patients with certain F8 mutations approaches the inhibitor incidence in severe patients.• These findings are highly relevant for clinical practice, as they facilitate identification of high-risk patients based on F8 genotype.Neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) toward factor VIII form a severe complication in nonsevere hemophilia A, profoundly aggravating the bleeding pattern. Identification of high-risk patients is hampered by lack of data that take exposure days to therapeutic factor VIII concentrates into account. In the INSIGHT study, we analyzed the association between F8 mutation and inhibitor development in patients with nonsevere hemophilia A (factor VIII 2-40 IU/dL). This analysis included 1112 nonsevere hemophilia A patients from 14 centers in Europe and Australia that had genotyped at least 70% of their patients. Inhibitor risk was calculated as KaplanMeier incidence with cumulative number of exposure days as the time variable. During 44 800 exposure days (median, 24 exposure days per patient; interquartile range [IQR], 7-90), 59 of the 1112 patients developed an inhibitor; cumulative incidence of 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-6.6) after a median of 28 exposure days (IQR,. The inhibitor risk at 50 exposure days was 6.7% (95% CI, 4.5-8.9) and at 100 exposure days the risk further increased to 13.3% (95% CI, 9.6-17.0). Among a total of 214 different F8 missense mutations 19 were associated with inhibitor development. These results emphasize the importance of F8 genotyping in nonsevere hemophilia A. (Blood. 2013; 122(11):1954-1962 IntroductionPatients with hemophilia A who are treated with factor VIII concentrates are at risk of developing factor VIII neutralizing alloantibodies (inhibitors).1,2 Inhibitor development is one of the most challenging complications in the treatment of hemophilia A, as it increases the bleeding tendency while it renders treatment with therapeutic factor VIII concentrates ineffective. Although inhibitor development is less frequently observed in patients with nonsevere hemophilia A (baseline factor VIII activity of 2-40 IU/dL), the clinical impact can be profound. In these patients, inhibitors may also interact with their endogenous factor VIII, resulting in a decrease of the factor VIII plasma level below 1 IU/dL 1 and major bleeding complications. 4 Identification of patients at risk of developing inhibitors may help to prevent this serious complication. However, currently there are no tools available to predict individual inhibitor risk in nonsevere hemophilia patients.The type of mutation in the factor VIII gene (F8) is an important risk factor for inhibitor development. [5][6][7] Nonsevere hemophilia A is generally caused by F8 missense mutations.8 Despite information on large numbers of F8 mutations associated with nonsevere hemophilia A that is collected in international databases, 9,10 it is not possible to calculate the inhibitor risk for specific F8 mutations, as data on exposure days to thera...

(Gut 2000;47:845-851)

Recommendations for dental preventive strategies and treatment planning were originally developed through consensus meetings by the Scottish Oral Health Group for Medically Compromised Patients and published in 2003 as a Guideline. The United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors' Organisation (UKHCDO) Dental Working Party has updated these recommendations following the AGREE II approach (www.agreetrust.org), involving a literature search, a review of national and international guidelines and after seeking the opinions of haemophilia treaters in the United Kingdom by an online survey. Where possible, evidence from the literature is graded according to the 'GRADE' system (www.bcshguidelines.com/bsch_process/evidence_levels_and_grades_of_recommendations/43_grade.html); however, overall there is a lack of robust data and most studies have methodological limitations. The objective of this guidance, which is largely consensus-based, is to assist dental practitioners in primary and secondary care to provide routine dental care for patients of all ages with congenital bleeding diatheses in order to improve overall access to dental care. The guidance may not be appropriate in all cases and individual patient circumstances may dictate an alternative approach. Date for guideline review: May 2016.

• rVWF is safe, well tolerated, and has a PK profile generally comparable to pdVWF, but promotes enhanced stabilization of endogenous FVIII.Safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of recombinant von Willebrand factor (rVWF) combined at a fixed ratio with recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) were investigated in 32 subjects with type 3 or severe type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) in a prospective phase 1, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. rVWF was well tolerated and no thrombotic events, inhibitors, or serious adverse events were observed. The PK of rVWF ristocetin cofactor activity, VWF antigen, and collagen-binding activity were similar to those of the comparator plasmaderived (pd) VWF-pdFVIII. In vivo cleavage of ultra-large molecular-weight rVWF multimers by ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13; the endogenous VWF protease) and generation of characteristic satellite bands were demonstrated. In 2 subjects with specific nonneutralizing anti-VWF-binding antibodies already detectable before rVWF infusion, a reduction in VWF multimers and VWF activity was observed. Stabilization of endogenous FVIII was enhanced following post-rVWF-rFVIII infusion as shown by the difference in area under the plasma concentration curve compared with pdVWF-pdFVIII (AUC 0-' ) (P < .01). These data support the concept of administering rVWF alone once a therapeutic level of endogenous FVIII is achieved. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00816660. (Blood. 2013;122(5):648-657)

No abstract