1964
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-196401000-00033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatic Function and Halothane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1971
1971

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…percentage retention at the one-week and three-week post-exposure periods, but the figures do not differ significantly from those in Table I. al., 1958;Burnap et al, 1958;Carson et al, 1959;Griffiths and Ozguc, 1964;Joseph, 1964;Keeri-SzAt6, 1965), Retention (± S.D.) after in dogs (Brindle et al, 1957), in sheep (Hull and Reilly, 1968), res and in calves (Middleton et al, 1966 (Combes and Stakelum, 1962) to support the view that the 5 ±3 6±3 removal of B.S.P.…”
Section: Isolated Liver Perfusionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…percentage retention at the one-week and three-week post-exposure periods, but the figures do not differ significantly from those in Table I. al., 1958;Burnap et al, 1958;Carson et al, 1959;Griffiths and Ozguc, 1964;Joseph, 1964;Keeri-SzAt6, 1965), Retention (± S.D.) after in dogs (Brindle et al, 1957), in sheep (Hull and Reilly, 1968), res and in calves (Middleton et al, 1966 (Combes and Stakelum, 1962) to support the view that the 5 ±3 6±3 removal of B.S.P.…”
Section: Isolated Liver Perfusionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…have previously been reported in (Brindle al., 1957; values v. control (Student's Virtue et al, 1958;Burnap et al, 1958;Carson et al, 1959;Griffiths and Ozguc, 1964;Joseph, 1964;Keeri-SzAt6, 1965), Retention (± S.D.) after in dogs (Brindle et al, 1957), in sheep (Hull and Reilly, 1968), res and in calves (Middleton et al, 1966).…”
Section: Isolated Liver Perfusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the present time there is no anaesthetic drug in common use which will cause liver necrosis in both man and the experimental animal Investigations of the liver function of patients before and after major operations performed under modern anaesthetic methods have failed to reveal any deterioration beyond that normally expected after major surgery (Sadove and Wallace, 1962). The degree of postoperative liver dysfunction appears to be uninfluenced by the type of anaesthesia used (Little and Given, 1964;Joseph, 1964). Retrospective studies of the incidence of postoperative liver failure have shown it to be relatively unaltered irrespective of the changes which have occurred in anaesthetic methods (Dawson et al, 1963;Mazzia, 1963;Keeri-Szant6 and Lafleur, 1963;Wilson, Tarrow and Garvin, 1964;Allen and Metcalf, 1964;Slater et al, 1964;Mushin et al, 1964;Reichmann and Wohlgemuth, 1964;Collins and Fabian, 1964;Henderson and Gordon, 1964).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%